What the Label Framework Predicts: a Catalogue of Tests Across Physics

In the label framework matter is a field of comoving labels with volume-preserving relabellings, and numbers are outputs or labels, values that symmetry does not fix. We list its predictions across physics with their status, whether they differ from the standard picture or from MOND, and which data test them. Of 62 items, 19 differ from the standard picture with its usual dark-matter extensions, 7 from MOND, and 13 are negative results; each holds under the premises given with it. A literature sweep, mostly of abstracts, finds none of the distinguishing items refuted as stated, and four are contested by present data. For galaxies the framework predicts no MOND-like external-field effect and a Tully–Fisher slope rising from 3.4 to 4.0 between 20 and 300 km s⁻¹; under a host-epoch rule other than the one that gives the slope, it also predicts an acceleration level growing with redshift. In cosmology, if the apparent phantom comes from the coupling m(φ), a line S8(w̄) ties it to the growth of structure. For particles, a classical argument in two quantisation schemes shows that dark matter cannot both carry an abelian gauge charge and annihilate. In laboratory physics no new number appears.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23871777
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

What the Label Framework Predicts: a Catalogue of Tests Across Physics

Viacheslav Loginov
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
preprint

What the Label Framework Predicts: a Catalogue of Tests Across Physics

Viacheslav Loginov
preprint en

Abstract

In the label framework matter is a field of comoving labels with volume-preserving relabellings, and numbers are outputs or labels, values that symmetry does not fix. We list its predictions across physics with their status, whether they differ from the standard picture or from MOND, and which data test them. Of 62 items, 19 differ from the standard picture with its usual dark-matter extensions, 7 from MOND, and 13 are negative results; each holds under the premises given with it. A literature sweep, mostly of abstracts, finds none of the distinguishing items refuted as stated, and four are contested by present data. For galaxies the framework predicts no MOND-like external-field effect and a Tully–Fisher slope rising from 3.4 to 4.0 between 20 and 300 km s⁻¹; under a host-epoch rule other than the one that gives the slope, it also predicts an acceleration level growing with redshift. In cosmology, if the apparent phantom comes from the coupling m(φ), a line S8(w̄) ties it to the growth of structure. For particles, a classical argument in two quantisation schemes shows that dark matter cannot both carry an abelian gauge charge and annihilate. In laboratory physics no new number appears.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon