The Wellness Heritage of Malay and Chinese Food & Medicine Homology Traditions in Malaysia
This qualitative study compares nasi ulam (a traditional Malay rice dish mixed with fresh herbs) and bak kut teh(a Chinese Malaysian herbal pork rib soup) as culturally situated Malay and Malaysian Chinese food practices through which participants express ideas about health, bodily balance, and heritage. Food and Medicine Homology (FMH), derived from Chinese dietary discourse, is used here as a comparative analytical label, not as an indigenous Malay category or a claim that the two traditions are conceptually identical. Drawing on interviews, observation, and six selected culinary and medicinal texts, the article asks how participants describe bodily health through these dishes and how they interpret environmental conditions, medicinal food knowledge, and intergenerational transmission in maintaining these practices. The field materials cited in the manuscript are dated November 2024–May 2025 and concern Klang, Kelantan, and Terengganu. Participants associated nasi ulam with panas, sejuk, and angin, and bak kut teh with warming, qi, and related Chinese dietetic vocabularies; these are reported cultural interpretations rather than independently demonstrated physiological effects. Evidence of adaptation in recipes and commercial packaging also complicates a simple contrast between stable ethnic traditions. The contribution lies in identifying both the usefulness and limits of comparison across distinctive ethnomedical vocabularies and social settings. The study does not establish historical climatic causation or clinical efficacy.
Authors
- Lay Hoon Ang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2489-7620)
- Zalina Mohd Kasim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1828-9503)
- Xianyue Lang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3327-4039)
Publication Details
- Journal
- 語言與跨文化研究
- Published
- 2026-11-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.70693/jlis.v1i1.697
- Primary Topic
- Food, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00