Influence of dominant sequence artifacts on generative AI for virtual contrast-enhancement in breast MRI
Abstract Background Virtual contrast-enhanced (vCE) breast MRI is a deep learning approach for generating contrast-like images from non-contrast acquisitions. As diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has emerged as a major contributor to enhancement synthesis, understanding the influence of DWI-related image artifacts is important for the robustness and potential clinical implementation of AI-based contrast-free imaging approaches. We evaluated the robustness of a pix2pix-based vCE synthesis model to artifact-contaminated DWI during training and inference. Materials and methods This IRB-approved, retrospective study included 1,974 multiparametric breast MRI examinations (mean age: 49 years) acquired with two clinical routine 3T MRI scanners (2017–2022). High b-value (b = 1500 s/mm 2 ) DWI images were automatically classified for high-intensity (HI) and low-intensity (LI) artifacts using a pretrained neural network. A pix2pix 2D-GAN was trained either after excluding artifact-affected slices (vCE-clean) or using all available slices (vCE-all). Performance was evaluated using image similarity metrics, lesion-based analysis, reader assessment, and correlation of artifact scores with reconstruction errors. Results Excluding artifact-affected slices during training resulted in a small but statistically significant increase in whole-image structural similarity index (SSIM) with small effect size ( vCE-all 0.843 ± 0.034; vCE-clean 0.849 ± 0.031, p < 0.001, d av = 0.20). However, lesion-based metrics and qualitative ratings of lesion enhancement and image quality were comparable between models. During Inference, strong LI DWI artifacts were associated with higher lesion-based errors. Conclusion Controlling for artifacts on diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) during vCE training only minorly influenced technical metrics but not perceived image quality/lesion enhancement. In contrast, severe signal-loss artifacts during inference impaired local performance, highlighting the importance of image quality control during potential deployment.
Authors
- Florian Knöll (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5357-8656)
- Frederik Bernd Laun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9269-5609)
- Luise Brock (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4591-4354)
- Evelyn Wenkel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4078-5546)
- Sebastian Bickelhaupt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1043-4462)
- Lorenz A. Kapsner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1866-860X)
- Tri-Thien Nguyen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0974-3299)
- Sabine Ohlmeyer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9163-8840)
- Hannes Schreiter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4373-6996)
- Michael Uder (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6238-4247)
- Marie Metz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1459-5741)
- Shirin Heidarikahkesh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7479-693X)
- Ameya Markale (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9830-7496)
- Aju George
- Julian Pfann Hossbach
Institutions
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
- Institute of Computer Science (PL)
- Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE)
- Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMC Medical Imaging
- Published
- 2026-11-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02996-8
- Primary Topic
- MRI in cancer diagnosis
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00