Algorithmic Bioethics: A Defense and Demonstration

In this paper, we argue for the adoption of algorithmic bioethics, which uses algorithms, in the form of decision trees, to articulate, understand, apply, and evaluate bioethical arguments. Algorithms bring many benefits to the study of bioethics: they clearly, precisely, and transparently articulate the decision procedure and facts relevant to an ethical decision; furthermore, they can be used to systematically discover, map out, and compare different ethical decision procedures concerning a practical issue. We then also outline and tackle potential limitations of algorithmic bioethics, and explore future directions for using decision trees in bioethics. Throughout, we illustrate our points using a case study of ethical decision trees, created with the help of large language models, about conscientious objection in medicine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioethics
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.70211
Primary Topic
Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithmic Bioethics: A Defense and Demonstration

Julian Savulescu, Brian David Earp, Shang Long Yeo, Sebastian Porsdam Mann
Bioethics
Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
article

Algorithmic Bioethics: A Defense and Demonstration

Julian Savulescu, Brian David Earp, Shang Long Yeo, Sebastian Porsdam Mann
article en

Abstract

In this paper, we argue for the adoption of algorithmic bioethics, which uses algorithms, in the form of decision trees, to articulate, understand, apply, and evaluate bioethical arguments. Algorithms bring many benefits to the study of bioethics: they clearly, precisely, and transparently articulate the decision procedure and facts relevant to an ethical decision; furthermore, they can be used to systematically discover, map out, and compare different ethical decision procedures concerning a practical issue. We then also outline and tackle potential limitations of algorithmic bioethics, and explore future directions for using decision trees in bioethics. Throughout, we illustrate our points using a case study of ethical decision trees, created with the help of large language models, about conscientious objection in medicine.

Bioethics
National University of Singapore (SG), University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon