Advocacy ( Fürsprache ) between rhetoric and being‐with ( Mitsein ): On the relation between solicitude ( Fürsorge ), language, and affect in Heidegger

Abstract This contribution discusses advocacy with reference to Heidegger's Being and Time. A link between the rhetorical structure of speaking‐for and Being and Time can be established through Basic Concepts of Aristotelian Philosophy , lectures which Heidegger delivered a few years preceding Being and Time. Most relevant in Heidegger's discussion of rhetorics in this context is the theory of affects in Aristotle's Rhetoric and what Heidegger comes to term “mood.” With “mood” Heidegger addresses the states‐of‐mind in being with others in the public sphere, or in his words, the being‐with of the “They.” A meaningful understanding of speaking‐for is in Being and Times however only possible when we leave the sphere of the “They,” in terms of mood: of fear and comparable affects. Accessing the realm of individual subjectivity, we are confronted with Angst, the variant of fear without a determined object, that is, the affective state‐of‐mind where the individual meets his or her finitude. It is in the individual subject—and not in the public sphere—that the elements of a theory of speaking‐for resurface in Heidegger, with the “call” which we receive on the one hand, and the possibility of addressing the other as “the friend” on the other.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orbis Litterarum
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/oli.70080
Primary Topic
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advocacy ( Fürsprache ) between rhetoric and being‐with ( Mitsein ): On the relation between solicitude ( Fürsorge ), language, and affect in Heidegger

Anja Lemke
Orbis Litterarum
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
article

Advocacy ( Fürsprache ) between rhetoric and being‐with ( Mitsein ): On the relation between solicitude ( Fürsorge ), language, and affect in Heidegger

Anja Lemke
article en

Abstract

Abstract This contribution discusses advocacy with reference to Heidegger's Being and Time. A link between the rhetorical structure of speaking‐for and Being and Time can be established through Basic Concepts of Aristotelian Philosophy , lectures which Heidegger delivered a few years preceding Being and Time. Most relevant in Heidegger's discussion of rhetorics in this context is the theory of affects in Aristotle's Rhetoric and what Heidegger comes to term “mood.” With “mood” Heidegger addresses the states‐of‐mind in being with others in the public sphere, or in his words, the being‐with of the “They.” A meaningful understanding of speaking‐for is in Being and Times however only possible when we leave the sphere of the “They,” in terms of mood: of fear and comparable affects. Accessing the realm of individual subjectivity, we are confronted with Angst, the variant of fear without a determined object, that is, the affective state‐of‐mind where the individual meets his or her finitude. It is in the individual subject—and not in the public sphere—that the elements of a theory of speaking‐for resurface in Heidegger, with the “call” which we receive on the one hand, and the possibility of addressing the other as “the friend” on the other.

Orbis Litterarum
University of Cologne (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon