Public views and acceptability of policies designed to achieve a healthy weight across the United Kingdom: qualitative analysis of the role of government mistrust and legitimacy of policy actors

Abstract Background Rates of overweight and obesity for children, young people and adults remain high in the UK and globally. Research demonstrates that policies continue to drift downstream and focus largely on individual behaviours. In response, the Obesity Health Alliance (OHA) in the UK published– Turning the Tide: A 10 Year Healthy Weight Strategy – a long-term agenda of evidence-informed policies with 30 recommendations. A key aspect to the successful implementation of policies is public acceptability. The study aimed to explore public views of obesity policy recommendations in the OHA’s Healthy Weight Strategy, and broader views on the policy process surrounding the implementation of these recommendations. Methods Participants engaged in a qualitative two-stage interview approach was designed for the study, with 26 participants recruited across England, Scotland and Wales. Participants were recruited to the study using a commissioned, established, GDPR compliant market research agency based in England. Interviews were conducted between October 2021 and January 2022. Data were analysed thematically using NVivo. Results Findings demonstrate a broad acceptance of the policy recommendations, with a desire for those that support individual autonomy. Children were viewed as a key population, as well as a powerful framing device through which to improve policy support. Despite policy support, participants expressed a lack of trust in the government’s will or ability to implement the policies, something that a range of studies relating to other policy areas have found in the UK context. There was also a tension surrounding who is or is not a legitimate policy actor, with strong support for government and public involvement, and a rejection of industry participation in policy making. Conclusions These findings add to the growing literature on public acceptability of policies relevant to overweight and obesity. In this study, the acceptability of such policies appeared to be underpinned by whether or not participants trusted those holding power to implement the policies effectively and act in the best interests of the public. There is a need to continue to engage the public in wider policy debates regarding population health and policy options available to improve it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28407-9
Primary Topic
Obesity and Health Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public views and acceptability of policies designed to achieve a healthy weight across the United Kingdom: qualitative analysis of the role of government mistrust and legitimacy of policy actors

Imogen Bevan, Linda Bauld, Lauren Carters-White, Caroline Cerny et al.
BMC Public Health
Obesity and Health Practices
article

Public views and acceptability of policies designed to achieve a healthy weight across the United Kingdom: qualitative analysis of the role of government mistrust and legitimacy of policy actors

Imogen Bevan, Linda Bauld, Lauren Carters-White, Caroline Cerny, Keith Syrett, Olivia Brown
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Rates of overweight and obesity for children, young people and adults remain high in the UK and globally. Research demonstrates that policies continue to drift downstream and focus largely on individual behaviours. In response, the Obesity Health Alliance (OHA) in the UK published– Turning the Tide: A 10 Year Healthy Weight Strategy – a long-term agenda of evidence-informed policies with 30 recommendations. A key aspect to the successful implementation of policies is public acceptability. The study aimed to explore public views of obesity policy recommendations in the OHA’s Healthy Weight Strategy, and broader views on the policy process surrounding the implementation of these recommendations. Methods Participants engaged in a qualitative two-stage interview approach was designed for the study, with 26 participants recruited across England, Scotland and Wales. Participants were recruited to the study using a commissioned, established, GDPR compliant market research agency based in England. Interviews were conducted between October 2021 and January 2022. Data were analysed thematically using NVivo. Results Findings demonstrate a broad acceptance of the policy recommendations, with a desire for those that support individual autonomy. Children were viewed as a key population, as well as a powerful framing device through which to improve policy support. Despite policy support, participants expressed a lack of trust in the government’s will or ability to implement the policies, something that a range of studies relating to other policy areas have found in the UK context. There was also a tension surrounding who is or is not a legitimate policy actor, with strong support for government and public involvement, and a rejection of industry participation in policy making. Conclusions These findings add to the growing literature on public acceptability of policies relevant to overweight and obesity. In this study, the acceptability of such policies appeared to be underpinned by whether or not participants trusted those holding power to implement the policies effectively and act in the best interests of the public. There is a need to continue to engage the public in wider policy debates regarding population health and policy options available to improve it.

BMC Public Health
University of Stirling (GB), University of Nottingham (GB), Action on Smoking and Health (GB), Nottingham City Hospital (GB), University of Bristol (GB), Institute of Geography (KZ), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Obesity and Health Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon