Digital Bureaucracy and the Paradox of Participation in Indonesia

This study explores the relation between digital bureaucracy, public engagement, and challenges in Indonesian governance via an ILR consisting of 57 articles indexed in Scopus (2021-2024). Though Indonesia strongly advocates for digital transformation, the results of the study indicate a significant gap. Despite implementing Digital Bureaucracy, Indonesia has been unable to overcome its governance deficit. Indeed, what the study has found is the Paradox of Participation, whereby digital technology aimed at empowering individuals is being used by entrenched patrimonial groups. In other words, without proper institutions, digitalisation becomes a source of oppression in that it helps elites in their practices of digital despotism and surveillance rather than democracy. This indicates that technology merely amplifies the power dynamics already existing in the society. Thus, solving the problem of Challenges for Public Policy Governance will require addressing the underlying extractive nature of the institutions rather than technological problems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v18i2.1283
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Bureaucracy and the Paradox of Participation in Indonesia

Wimmy Haliim
JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government
E-Government and Public Services
article

Digital Bureaucracy and the Paradox of Participation in Indonesia

Wimmy Haliim
article en

Abstract

This study explores the relation between digital bureaucracy, public engagement, and challenges in Indonesian governance via an ILR consisting of 57 articles indexed in Scopus (2021-2024). Though Indonesia strongly advocates for digital transformation, the results of the study indicate a significant gap. Despite implementing Digital Bureaucracy, Indonesia has been unable to overcome its governance deficit. Indeed, what the study has found is the Paradox of Participation, whereby digital technology aimed at empowering individuals is being used by entrenched patrimonial groups. In other words, without proper institutions, digitalisation becomes a source of oppression in that it helps elites in their practices of digital despotism and surveillance rather than democracy. This indicates that technology merely amplifies the power dynamics already existing in the society. Thus, solving the problem of Challenges for Public Policy Governance will require addressing the underlying extractive nature of the institutions rather than technological problems.

JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open GovernmentVol. 18(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
E-Government and Public Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Digital Bureaucracy and the Paradox of Participation in Indonesia — Wimmy Haliim · JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS