Configuration-Specific Temporal Alignment of a Repurposed Wearable Fuel-Cell Alcohol Sensor with an MQ-3 Timing Proxy in a Laboratory Static-Headspace Chamber

Ethanol emitted from stressed woody tissues is a host-associated cue for ambrosia beetles, motivating investigation of portable ethanol-responsive sensors for future tree monitoring. This laboratory study evaluated temporal alignment between two asynchronously logged volatile organic compound (VOC)-responsive sensors during a denatured-alcohol chamber challenge. We selected the BACtrack Skyn wearable fuel-cell alcohol sensor for its compact form and timestamped output as a candidate for future tree-headspace measurements, and evaluated one device with an MQ-3 metal-oxide timing proxy and environmental logging in a closed static-headspace chamber. The dataset comprised five alcohol-free control runs (B0–B4) and three technical 1 μL denatured-alcohol challenge runs (EtOH1–EtOH3). Signals were processed on a common 1 min grid using a 10–15 min analytical baseline and a 15–45 min response-characterization window. MQ-3 peaks occurred at 17.0–17.3 min from the run origin (T0), whereas Skyn device-output peaks occurred at 18.8–19.2 min; peak-time offsets were 1.5–2.2 min. First-difference analysis selected a 2 min alignment setting on the primary 1 min grid in all three challenge runs; a supplementary 20 s analysis gave run-specific optima of 80–160 s. Across the three challenge runs, run-specific Pearson correlations ranged from 0.686 to 0.751 before alignment and from 0.861 to 0.930 after alignment; each coefficient was calculated from the paired 1 min observations in the 15–45 min response window. Normalized root-mean-square error (RMSE) ranged from 0.208 to 0.272 before alignment and from 0.121 to 0.230 after alignment, whereas rank correlation did not improve consistently. Alcohol-free controls remained below challenge-run peak magnitudes, although MQ-3 traces included drift and positive excursions. These within-run comparisons describe alignment in the tested configuration, not intrinsic sensor latency, concentration calibration, or validated tree-monitoring performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26216949
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Configuration-Specific Temporal Alignment of a Repurposed Wearable Fuel-Cell Alcohol Sensor with an MQ-3 Timing Proxy in a Laboratory Static-Headspace Chamber

Hasan Mirzakhaninafchi, Christopher M. Ranger, Glen C. Rains, Canicius J. Mwitta et al.
Sensors
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
article

Configuration-Specific Temporal Alignment of a Repurposed Wearable Fuel-Cell Alcohol Sensor with an MQ-3 Timing Proxy in a Laboratory Static-Headspace Chamber

Hasan Mirzakhaninafchi, Christopher M. Ranger, Glen C. Rains, Canicius J. Mwitta, Shekhar Thapa, Wesley Porter, Denis Kiobia, Peter Ngimbwa
article en

Abstract

Ethanol emitted from stressed woody tissues is a host-associated cue for ambrosia beetles, motivating investigation of portable ethanol-responsive sensors for future tree monitoring. This laboratory study evaluated temporal alignment between two asynchronously logged volatile organic compound (VOC)-responsive sensors during a denatured-alcohol chamber challenge. We selected the BACtrack Skyn wearable fuel-cell alcohol sensor for its compact form and timestamped output as a candidate for future tree-headspace measurements, and evaluated one device with an MQ-3 metal-oxide timing proxy and environmental logging in a closed static-headspace chamber. The dataset comprised five alcohol-free control runs (B0–B4) and three technical 1 μL denatured-alcohol challenge runs (EtOH1–EtOH3). Signals were processed on a common 1 min grid using a 10–15 min analytical baseline and a 15–45 min response-characterization window. MQ-3 peaks occurred at 17.0–17.3 min from the run origin (T0), whereas Skyn device-output peaks occurred at 18.8–19.2 min; peak-time offsets were 1.5–2.2 min. First-difference analysis selected a 2 min alignment setting on the primary 1 min grid in all three challenge runs; a supplementary 20 s analysis gave run-specific optima of 80–160 s. Across the three challenge runs, run-specific Pearson correlations ranged from 0.686 to 0.751 before alignment and from 0.861 to 0.930 after alignment; each coefficient was calculated from the paired 1 min observations in the 15–45 min response window. Normalized root-mean-square error (RMSE) ranged from 0.208 to 0.272 before alignment and from 0.121 to 0.230 after alignment, whereas rank correlation did not improve consistently. Alcohol-free controls remained below challenge-run peak magnitudes, although MQ-3 traces included drift and positive excursions. These within-run comparisons describe alignment in the tested configuration, not intrinsic sensor latency, concentration calibration, or validated tree-monitoring performance.

SensorsVol. 26(21)
United States Department of Agriculture (US), University of Georgia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon