Six Percent the Theory Can't Pay

For ninety years, from 1889 to 1978, American stocks paid 6.98 percent a year in real terms while the safest short-term debt paid 0.80 percent. The difference, 6.18 percent a year, is the equity premium, and in 1985 Mehra and Prescott showed that the standard general-equilibrium model of a rational saver, fed the measured consumption record, can generate at most 0.35 percent of it over its admissible parameter range. The theory pays one-eighteenth of the bill; matching the record requires relative risk aversion above 30, against a plausibility ceiling near 10, and at risk aversion 30 the model's saver prefers $51,209 certain over a fair 50/50 gamble between $50,000 and $100,000 (certainty equivalent recomputed in the production notebook). This paper prices the four famous doors opened since: habit formation (Campbell and Cochrane 1999), rare disasters (Rietz 1988; Barro 2006: disaster probability about 1.7 percent per year, contractions 15 to 64 percent), myopic loss aversion (Benartzi and Thaler 1995: the premium matches prospect-theory parameters if investors evaluate annually), and the survivorship correction (Dimson, Marsh and Staunton: world premium 4.7 percent, expected 4.5 to 5 percent arithmetic, still about thirteen times the model's ceiling). Every door is open; none is free; each pays the premium only by importing a new assumed quantity rather than deriving it. Grade: DEFECT STANDS — FORTY YEARS, EVERY DOOR PRICED, NONE FREE. This paper belongs to the breadth program of the author's corpus; it touches no claim of the physics core.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23926174
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Six Percent the Theory Can't Pay

William Alexander Aldred
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
preprint

Six Percent the Theory Can't Pay

William Alexander Aldred
preprint en

Abstract

For ninety years, from 1889 to 1978, American stocks paid 6.98 percent a year in real terms while the safest short-term debt paid 0.80 percent. The difference, 6.18 percent a year, is the equity premium, and in 1985 Mehra and Prescott showed that the standard general-equilibrium model of a rational saver, fed the measured consumption record, can generate at most 0.35 percent of it over its admissible parameter range. The theory pays one-eighteenth of the bill; matching the record requires relative risk aversion above 30, against a plausibility ceiling near 10, and at risk aversion 30 the model's saver prefers $51,209 certain over a fair 50/50 gamble between $50,000 and $100,000 (certainty equivalent recomputed in the production notebook). This paper prices the four famous doors opened since: habit formation (Campbell and Cochrane 1999), rare disasters (Rietz 1988; Barro 2006: disaster probability about 1.7 percent per year, contractions 15 to 64 percent), myopic loss aversion (Benartzi and Thaler 1995: the premium matches prospect-theory parameters if investors evaluate annually), and the survivorship correction (Dimson, Marsh and Staunton: world premium 4.7 percent, expected 4.5 to 5 percent arithmetic, still about thirteen times the model's ceiling). Every door is open; none is free; each pays the premium only by importing a new assumed quantity rather than deriving it. Grade: DEFECT STANDS — FORTY YEARS, EVERY DOOR PRICED, NONE FREE. This paper belongs to the breadth program of the author's corpus; it touches no claim of the physics core.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon