All Five Golden Pairs Are Slices of Four-Dimensional Solids: Golden Cuts beyond Plato

Slice a four-dimensional cube, the tesseract, straight across its longest diagonal and every slice is a tetrahedron with its corners cut off. At two golden heights the cuts are exactly the golden cuts of #88, one either side of the classical truncated tetrahedron at half height. The golden dodecahedra appear the same way in the 120-cell, so four of the five golden pairs of the regular solids are slices of regular four-dimensional solids. The cubes are the exception, and we prove it: no slice of a regular four-dimensional solid is a cube with its corners cut. They live one step away, in the rectified tesseract, the four-dimensional cube cut back to the middles of its edges, whose slices are cubes cut at every depth, both golden ones included. Beyond the regular solids golden cuts are rare: a solid with two kinds of face never has one; two solids come close, with every face golden or regular; two rhombic solids have their own golden pair; and the four star polyhedra of Kepler and Poinsot have two each. In #88 we showed that each Platonic solid has exactly two golden cuts, the Greater and Lesser Golden Cut solids, and that the icosahedral and octahedral pairs are sections of the 120-cell and the 24-cell. DICTO proposed carrying the golden cuts beyond the Platonic solids. Our main theorem is four-dimensional: the sections of the tesseract perpendicular to a long diagonal, between its two middle layers of corners, are exactly the tetrahedra cut at x = (1 − h)/(2 − h), so that the Greater Golden Cut Tetrahedron, the Archimedean truncated tetrahedron and the Lesser Golden Cut Tetrahedron are the sections at heights 1/φ², 1/2 and 1/φ; the golden tetrahedra are also sections of the 120-cell, and the Greater and Lesser Golden Cut Dodecahedra are its cell-first sections at 1/φ² and 1/φ of the way between two layers of corners. Hence the golden pairs of the dodecahedron, icosahedron, tetrahedron and octahedron are all sections of regular four-dimensional solids. The golden cubes are not: no hyperplane section of any of the six regular four-dimensional solids is a cube cut at its corners, at any depth (Theorem A). They are one step away: the sections x1 = h of the rectified tesseract with corners (±1, ±1, ±1, 0) are exactly the cubes cut at x = h/2, so the Greater and Lesser Golden Cut Cubes are its sections at h = 2x_G and 2x_L, as the golden octahedra are sections of the rectified 16-cell, the 24-cell (Theorem B); nine uniform polytopes of the tesseract and 24-cell families have golden cube sections. DICTO proposed that cut cubes and small octahedra fill space; they do at every depth, and this filling is a section of the rectified tesseractic honeycomb. Beyond Plato: the twelve golden cut depths of the regular triangle, square, pentagon, hexagon, octagon and decagon are all different, so no Archimedean solid has a cut making every face golden; only the icosidodecahedron and the snub dodecahedron have cuts making every face golden or regular, two each, at 1/(φ√5) and 1/3, a new family, the DICTO Golden-Regular Cuts (for the icosidodecahedron, Zefiro's 2011 regular-decagon and regular-hexagon stages, here read as golden), and DICTO added the two lesser ones, whose truncated triangles have ratio exactly φ, to the DICTO-GTT-Solids; among the Catalan solids only the rhombic dodecahedron and the rhombic triacontahedron have golden cuts, exactly two each, in closed form, which join the DICTO-Kepler golden truncations; and each Kepler–Poinsot star polyhedron has two, none of which is a section of the ten regular star polytopes in the icosahedral direction (floating-point search). All results are exact in the number fields of the solids, except where stated. The idea of carrying the golden cuts of #88 beyond the Platonic solids, the choice of this research, the golden cuts themselves, the names of the new solids and of the families, the two new members of the DICTO-GTT-Solids, the proposition that a cut cube should have a place where it takes the octahedron's place, the filling by cut cubes and octahedra, and the star-polytope search are DICTO's. Computation, proofs, exact checks and drafting with Claude (Anthropic).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23917931
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

All Five Golden Pairs Are Slices of Four-Dimensional Solids: Golden Cuts beyond Plato

DICTO
2 citations
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
preprint

All Five Golden Pairs Are Slices of Four-Dimensional Solids: Golden Cuts beyond Plato

DICTO
preprint en
2 citations

Abstract

Slice a four-dimensional cube, the tesseract, straight across its longest diagonal and every slice is a tetrahedron with its corners cut off. At two golden heights the cuts are exactly the golden cuts of #88, one either side of the classical truncated tetrahedron at half height. The golden dodecahedra appear the same way in the 120-cell, so four of the five golden pairs of the regular solids are slices of regular four-dimensional solids. The cubes are the exception, and we prove it: no slice of a regular four-dimensional solid is a cube with its corners cut. They live one step away, in the rectified tesseract, the four-dimensional cube cut back to the middles of its edges, whose slices are cubes cut at every depth, both golden ones included. Beyond the regular solids golden cuts are rare: a solid with two kinds of face never has one; two solids come close, with every face golden or regular; two rhombic solids have their own golden pair; and the four star polyhedra of Kepler and Poinsot have two each. In #88 we showed that each Platonic solid has exactly two golden cuts, the Greater and Lesser Golden Cut solids, and that the icosahedral and octahedral pairs are sections of the 120-cell and the 24-cell. DICTO proposed carrying the golden cuts beyond the Platonic solids. Our main theorem is four-dimensional: the sections of the tesseract perpendicular to a long diagonal, between its two middle layers of corners, are exactly the tetrahedra cut at x = (1 − h)/(2 − h), so that the Greater Golden Cut Tetrahedron, the Archimedean truncated tetrahedron and the Lesser Golden Cut Tetrahedron are the sections at heights 1/φ², 1/2 and 1/φ; the golden tetrahedra are also sections of the 120-cell, and the Greater and Lesser Golden Cut Dodecahedra are its cell-first sections at 1/φ² and 1/φ of the way between two layers of corners. Hence the golden pairs of the dodecahedron, icosahedron, tetrahedron and octahedron are all sections of regular four-dimensional solids. The golden cubes are not: no hyperplane section of any of the six regular four-dimensional solids is a cube cut at its corners, at any depth (Theorem A). They are one step away: the sections x1 = h of the rectified tesseract with corners (±1, ±1, ±1, 0) are exactly the cubes cut at x = h/2, so the Greater and Lesser Golden Cut Cubes are its sections at h = 2x_G and 2x_L, as the golden octahedra are sections of the rectified 16-cell, the 24-cell (Theorem B); nine uniform polytopes of the tesseract and 24-cell families have golden cube sections. DICTO proposed that cut cubes and small octahedra fill space; they do at every depth, and this filling is a section of the rectified tesseractic honeycomb. Beyond Plato: the twelve golden cut depths of the regular triangle, square, pentagon, hexagon, octagon and decagon are all different, so no Archimedean solid has a cut making every face golden; only the icosidodecahedron and the snub dodecahedron have cuts making every face golden or regular, two each, at 1/(φ√5) and 1/3, a new family, the DICTO Golden-Regular Cuts (for the icosidodecahedron, Zefiro's 2011 regular-decagon and regular-hexagon stages, here read as golden), and DICTO added the two lesser ones, whose truncated triangles have ratio exactly φ, to the DICTO-GTT-Solids; among the Catalan solids only the rhombic dodecahedron and the rhombic triacontahedron have golden cuts, exactly two each, in closed form, which join the DICTO-Kepler golden truncations; and each Kepler–Poinsot star polyhedron has two, none of which is a section of the ten regular star polytopes in the icosahedral direction (floating-point search). All results are exact in the number fields of the solids, except where stated. The idea of carrying the golden cuts of #88 beyond the Platonic solids, the choice of this research, the golden cuts themselves, the names of the new solids and of the families, the two new members of the DICTO-GTT-Solids, the proposition that a cut cube should have a place where it takes the octahedron's place, the filling by cut cubes and octahedra, and the star-polytope search are DICTO's. Computation, proofs, exact checks and drafting with Claude (Anthropic).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon