Admissibility of Testimony of a Person Against Whom Criminal Prosecution Has Been Initiated

The article focuses on the specifics of the legal regime governing statements made by a person prior to the initiation of criminal proceedings, taking into account the differences in the status of a witness and a suspect (accused). Based on the results of the analysis of legislation, doctrine and a sample of law enforcement acts, the characteristic features of the use of information provided by a subject in a lost status in proving are revealed. The article examines the features of the anti-formalist approach of the higher courts and its impact on practice, as well as the implementation of guarantees provided for in Article 51 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. In conclusion, recommendations are formulated for law enforcement officials, judges and representatives of the legal community

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Russian investigator
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3783-2026-11-9-12
Primary Topic
Legal processes and jurisprudence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Admissibility of Testimony of a Person Against Whom Criminal Prosecution Has Been Initiated

Pavel S. Zapotylko
Russian investigator
Legal processes and jurisprudence
article

Admissibility of Testimony of a Person Against Whom Criminal Prosecution Has Been Initiated

Pavel S. Zapotylko
article en

Abstract

The article focuses on the specifics of the legal regime governing statements made by a person prior to the initiation of criminal proceedings, taking into account the differences in the status of a witness and a suspect (accused). Based on the results of the analysis of legislation, doctrine and a sample of law enforcement acts, the characteristic features of the use of information provided by a subject in a lost status in proving are revealed. The article examines the features of the anti-formalist approach of the higher courts and its impact on practice, as well as the implementation of guarantees provided for in Article 51 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. In conclusion, recommendations are formulated for law enforcement officials, judges and representatives of the legal community

Russian investigator
Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Legal processes and jurisprudence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon