Supporting the EU Soil Monitoring Law Through Digital Soil Mapping: Evaluating Random Forest-Based Approaches in Tuscany (Italy)

Digital soil mapping (DSM) supports the implementation of the EU Soil Monitoring Law by providing spatially explicit information on key soil properties over large areas. Despite widespread use of machine learning techniques, the influence of modelling strategy and covariate quality on predictive performance remains unclear in heterogeneous regions. This study evaluated three Random Forest-based approaches, Random Forest (RF), Quantile Random Forest (QRF), and a regime-based model (RF-REGIME5), to predict topsoil properties (0–30 cm) across Tuscany (23,000 km2). Two predictor sets were tested: BASE (environmental covariates only) and AUGMENTED (with legacy soil data). Within the three RF-based approaches examined, the inclusion of legacy soil-derived predictors produced more consistent improvements in predictive performance than changes in modelling strategy. Soil-derived covariates improved predictive performance, while differences among modelling approaches were generally limited and property-dependent. QRF performed comparably and additionally quantified prediction uncertainty, especially for skewed variables like soil organic carbon. In contrast, the regime-based approach did not consistently outperform global models, as potential benefits from reduced environmental heterogeneity were offset by smaller sample sizes within individual domains. Overall, improving predictor datasets and expanding soil observation networks appear more effective than increasing model complexity for enhancing regional DSM applications and supporting future soil monitoring efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land15112094
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supporting the EU Soil Monitoring Law Through Digital Soil Mapping: Evaluating Random Forest-Based Approaches in Tuscany (Italy)

Lorenzo Gardin, Fabrizio Ungaro, Romina Lorenzetti
Land
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
article

Supporting the EU Soil Monitoring Law Through Digital Soil Mapping: Evaluating Random Forest-Based Approaches in Tuscany (Italy)

Lorenzo Gardin, Fabrizio Ungaro, Romina Lorenzetti
article en

Abstract

Digital soil mapping (DSM) supports the implementation of the EU Soil Monitoring Law by providing spatially explicit information on key soil properties over large areas. Despite widespread use of machine learning techniques, the influence of modelling strategy and covariate quality on predictive performance remains unclear in heterogeneous regions. This study evaluated three Random Forest-based approaches, Random Forest (RF), Quantile Random Forest (QRF), and a regime-based model (RF-REGIME5), to predict topsoil properties (0–30 cm) across Tuscany (23,000 km2). Two predictor sets were tested: BASE (environmental covariates only) and AUGMENTED (with legacy soil data). Within the three RF-based approaches examined, the inclusion of legacy soil-derived predictors produced more consistent improvements in predictive performance than changes in modelling strategy. Soil-derived covariates improved predictive performance, while differences among modelling approaches were generally limited and property-dependent. QRF performed comparably and additionally quantified prediction uncertainty, especially for skewed variables like soil organic carbon. In contrast, the regime-based approach did not consistently outperform global models, as potential benefits from reduced environmental heterogeneity were offset by smaller sample sizes within individual domains. Overall, improving predictor datasets and expanding soil observation networks appear more effective than increasing model complexity for enhancing regional DSM applications and supporting future soil monitoring efforts.

LandVol. 15(11)
LAM Foundation (US), Institute of Biosciences and Bioresources (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon