Identifying interstitial lung disease with large language models on clinical notes and claims

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a potentially fatal toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates. Drug-safety studies in healthcare databases identify ILD with claims-based algorithms that trade positive predictive value (PPV) against sensitivity. We assessed whether large language models (LLMs) improve on these algorithms, with and without electronic health record (EHR) notes, and whether these gains translate into measurable epidemiological benefits. In 309 oncology patients with ILD diagnosis codes at Mass General Brigham, adjudicated by two pulmonologists, we compared 12 open-access LLMs with 20 published claims-based algorithms. LLMs received claims, EHR notes, or both, without task-specific training. Measures were PPV and yield (proportion classified positive). We projected the attenuation of a drug-induced ILD odds ratio under non-differential outcome misclassification. LLMs extended the PPV-yield frontier of the published algorithms with all three inputs. Across the 36 model--input evaluations, LLM PPV exceeded that of the best algorithm without specialist-coding requirements (Algorithm 4) by 14.3 percentage points on average. With claims alone, Qwen3-8B achieved 89.8% PPV (95% CI 78.2-95.6) at 15.9% yield, versus 86.7% at 4.9% for the highest-PPV algorithm. With notes alone, Qwen3-32B achieved 78.9% PPV at 49.2% yield, versus 64.6% at 51.1% for Algorithm~4. With combined claims and notes, Qwen3-14B achieved 100.0% PPV at 24.3% yield. Under a simulated drug-safety scenario with a true odds ratio of 3.0, the projected observed odds ratio was 2.67 with combined inputs versus 1.07 with Algorithm 4, corresponding to a 46-fold difference in the estimated sample size required for 80% power (591 versus 27,200 patients). Zero-shot LLMs offer a higher-PPV alternative to rule-based claims phenotyping for ILD, on all three input types. Because the claims-only configuration uses the same claims data as existing algorithms, it could be deployed in administrative databases without linked notes, and may recover drug-safety signal otherwise lost to outcome misclassification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.30.26366942
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Identifying interstitial lung disease with large language models on clinical notes and claims

Sebastian Schneeweiß, Priyanka Anand, Jie Yang, Bowen Gu et al.
medRxiv
Machine Learning in Healthcare
preprint

Identifying interstitial lung disease with large language models on clinical notes and claims

Sebastian Schneeweiß, Priyanka Anand, Jie Yang, Bowen Gu, Guillaume Larghero, Joshua Kueiyu Lin
preprint en

Abstract

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a potentially fatal toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates. Drug-safety studies in healthcare databases identify ILD with claims-based algorithms that trade positive predictive value (PPV) against sensitivity. We assessed whether large language models (LLMs) improve on these algorithms, with and without electronic health record (EHR) notes, and whether these gains translate into measurable epidemiological benefits. In 309 oncology patients with ILD diagnosis codes at Mass General Brigham, adjudicated by two pulmonologists, we compared 12 open-access LLMs with 20 published claims-based algorithms. LLMs received claims, EHR notes, or both, without task-specific training. Measures were PPV and yield (proportion classified positive). We projected the attenuation of a drug-induced ILD odds ratio under non-differential outcome misclassification. LLMs extended the PPV-yield frontier of the published algorithms with all three inputs. Across the 36 model--input evaluations, LLM PPV exceeded that of the best algorithm without specialist-coding requirements (Algorithm 4) by 14.3 percentage points on average. With claims alone, Qwen3-8B achieved 89.8% PPV (95% CI 78.2-95.6) at 15.9% yield, versus 86.7% at 4.9% for the highest-PPV algorithm. With notes alone, Qwen3-32B achieved 78.9% PPV at 49.2% yield, versus 64.6% at 51.1% for Algorithm~4. With combined claims and notes, Qwen3-14B achieved 100.0% PPV at 24.3% yield. Under a simulated drug-safety scenario with a true odds ratio of 3.0, the projected observed odds ratio was 2.67 with combined inputs versus 1.07 with Algorithm 4, corresponding to a 46-fold difference in the estimated sample size required for 80% power (591 versus 27,200 patients). Zero-shot LLMs offer a higher-PPV alternative to rule-based claims phenotyping for ILD, on all three input types. Because the claims-only configuration uses the same claims data as existing algorithms, it could be deployed in administrative databases without linked notes, and may recover drug-safety signal otherwise lost to outcome misclassification.

medRxiv
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Mass General Brigham (US)
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon