Artificial Intelligence in Genetic Testing: From Variant Calling to Variant Interpretation

Genetic testing may help diagnose diseases by finding genetic variants, with variant calling and variant interpretation as its main steps. Variant calling compares sequencing data with a reference genome and identifies possible variants. Variant interpretation then assesses whether these variants may cause disease by using different types of evidence, such as allele frequency, phenotype matching, review status, and familial evidence. However, sequencing noise, alignment problems, and complex disease mechanisms can still affect both steps and reduce the accuracy of genetic testing. Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools can find patterns across these processes, but they currently work mainly as decision-support tools rather than independent evaluators. They also face three main problems: poor performance across different datasets, unexplainable outputs, and frequent errors in training data. New multimodal models and foundation models may help combine more types of information. Still, researchers need to confirm their safety and performance in clinical settings. This review examines the value of AI tools in genetic testing and discusses the main barriers to their independent use. It also explains why human expertise remains essential for final clinical diagnosis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Applied and Computational Engineering
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/2026.38442
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence in Genetic Testing: From Variant Calling to Variant Interpretation

Ziyi Peng
Applied and Computational Engineering
Genomics and Rare Diseases
article

Artificial Intelligence in Genetic Testing: From Variant Calling to Variant Interpretation

Ziyi Peng
article en

Abstract

Genetic testing may help diagnose diseases by finding genetic variants, with variant calling and variant interpretation as its main steps. Variant calling compares sequencing data with a reference genome and identifies possible variants. Variant interpretation then assesses whether these variants may cause disease by using different types of evidence, such as allele frequency, phenotype matching, review status, and familial evidence. However, sequencing noise, alignment problems, and complex disease mechanisms can still affect both steps and reduce the accuracy of genetic testing. Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools can find patterns across these processes, but they currently work mainly as decision-support tools rather than independent evaluators. They also face three main problems: poor performance across different datasets, unexplainable outputs, and frequent errors in training data. New multimodal models and foundation models may help combine more types of information. Still, researchers need to confirm their safety and performance in clinical settings. This review examines the value of AI tools in genetic testing and discusses the main barriers to their independent use. It also explains why human expertise remains essential for final clinical diagnosis.

Applied and Computational EngineeringVol. 280(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon