Direction-Dependent Encoding of Forward and Inverse Models in the Same Purkinje Cells

Saccadic eye movements are too fast to be guided by sensory feedback and therefore depend on precisely calibrated internal models. The cerebellum is widely thought to compute both forward and inverse models, yet how these two computations coexist in the same circuit remains unclear. We hypothesized that the same Purkinje cells (PCs) can serve as a forward model for saccades in one direction and as an inverse model for saccades in the opposite direction, because target neurons on either side of the cerebellar nuclei contribute differently to leftward and rightward saccades. To test this hypothesis, we recorded from PCs in the oculomotor vermis of macaque monkeys during repetitive saccade paradigms that induce adaptation and fatigue. Using the preferred error direction of each PC conveyed by increased complex spike (CS) activity (CS-on direction) as a proxy of the side of the cerebellar nuclei it projects to, we compared population activity for saccades directed against the CS-on direction (CS-on opposed) and along it (CS-on aligned). CS-on opposed saccades, (toward the PC's projection side) were accompanied by a precisely timed, sharp burst of simple spike (SS) activity at saccade onset that scaled with peak velocity, and CS error sensitivity was highest after the saccade. SS activity also changed systematically after adaptation, reflecting the altered kinematics of the adapted saccade. These properties are consistent with a forward model that estimates ongoing movement and updates itself based on post-movement error. In contrast, the CS-on aligned saccades, (away from the PC's projection side) were accompanied by broader SS modulation around saccade offset, and the CS error sensitivity was highest before the saccade. CSs around saccade onset encoded target location and initial eye position, and their occurrence was associated with reduced saccade amplitude. This reduction likely adjusts the motor command to the starting eye position, as expected for an inverse model that pre-programs the motor command before movement begins. Together, these findings provide neural evidence that the same PC population can contribute to both forward and inverse model computations, depending on saccade direction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.11.02.763589
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Direction-Dependent Encoding of Forward and Inverse Models in the Same Purkinje Cells

Peter Thier, Junya Inoue, Akshay Markanday
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Motor Control and Adaptation
preprint

Direction-Dependent Encoding of Forward and Inverse Models in the Same Purkinje Cells

Peter Thier, Junya Inoue, Akshay Markanday
preprint en

Abstract

Saccadic eye movements are too fast to be guided by sensory feedback and therefore depend on precisely calibrated internal models. The cerebellum is widely thought to compute both forward and inverse models, yet how these two computations coexist in the same circuit remains unclear. We hypothesized that the same Purkinje cells (PCs) can serve as a forward model for saccades in one direction and as an inverse model for saccades in the opposite direction, because target neurons on either side of the cerebellar nuclei contribute differently to leftward and rightward saccades. To test this hypothesis, we recorded from PCs in the oculomotor vermis of macaque monkeys during repetitive saccade paradigms that induce adaptation and fatigue. Using the preferred error direction of each PC conveyed by increased complex spike (CS) activity (CS-on direction) as a proxy of the side of the cerebellar nuclei it projects to, we compared population activity for saccades directed against the CS-on direction (CS-on opposed) and along it (CS-on aligned). CS-on opposed saccades, (toward the PC's projection side) were accompanied by a precisely timed, sharp burst of simple spike (SS) activity at saccade onset that scaled with peak velocity, and CS error sensitivity was highest after the saccade. SS activity also changed systematically after adaptation, reflecting the altered kinematics of the adapted saccade. These properties are consistent with a forward model that estimates ongoing movement and updates itself based on post-movement error. In contrast, the CS-on aligned saccades, (away from the PC's projection side) were accompanied by broader SS modulation around saccade offset, and the CS error sensitivity was highest before the saccade. CSs around saccade onset encoded target location and initial eye position, and their occurrence was associated with reduced saccade amplitude. This reduction likely adjusts the motor command to the starting eye position, as expected for an inverse model that pre-programs the motor command before movement begins. Together, these findings provide neural evidence that the same PC population can contribute to both forward and inverse model computations, depending on saccade direction.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research (DE), University of Tübingen (DE)
Motor Control and Adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon