Panel data analysis of tier 2 capital and capital adequacy in Australia and Singapore

This paper examines the profitability implications of Tier 2 capital and changes in regulatory capital adequacy (ΔCAR) in Australia and Singapore. Australia's 2019 loss-absorbing capacity policy, which substantially increased Tier 2 issuance among major banks, provides a useful setting for examining the profitability implications of Tier 2 capital relative to Singapore, where no comparable increase occurred during the study period. The study employs a semi-annual panel of seven major listed banks that dominate the Australian and Singaporean banking sectors from 2010 to 2024 and applies a bias-corrected fixed-effects estimator. Results show that Tier 2 capital is negatively associated with Return on Assets (ROA), with significant effects for Australian banks only. Although ΔCAR is negatively associated with profitability in pooled estimates, its effects are weaker and generally insignificant in country-specific analyses. The study contributes by providing evidence the profitability implications of Tier 2 capital differ from those of overall capital adequacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia and the Global Economy
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aglobe.2026.100154
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Panel data analysis of tier 2 capital and capital adequacy in Australia and Singapore

Qi Min Loke
Asia and the Global Economy
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

Panel data analysis of tier 2 capital and capital adequacy in Australia and Singapore

Qi Min Loke
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the profitability implications of Tier 2 capital and changes in regulatory capital adequacy (ΔCAR) in Australia and Singapore. Australia's 2019 loss-absorbing capacity policy, which substantially increased Tier 2 issuance among major banks, provides a useful setting for examining the profitability implications of Tier 2 capital relative to Singapore, where no comparable increase occurred during the study period. The study employs a semi-annual panel of seven major listed banks that dominate the Australian and Singaporean banking sectors from 2010 to 2024 and applies a bias-corrected fixed-effects estimator. Results show that Tier 2 capital is negatively associated with Return on Assets (ROA), with significant effects for Australian banks only. Although ΔCAR is negatively associated with profitability in pooled estimates, its effects are weaker and generally insignificant in country-specific analyses. The study contributes by providing evidence the profitability implications of Tier 2 capital differ from those of overall capital adequacy.

Asia and the Global EconomyVol. 6(2)
University of Canberra (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon