Nursing and Midwifery Grand Rounds Two Acute Hospitals

Nursing and Midwifery Grand Rounds (NMGR) have been well recognised internationally. Within an Irish context, there is a dearth of evidence and a lack of data relating to the impact of NMGRs from a Nursing and Midwifery perspective. The aim of this article is to identify the concepts relating to the successful implementation of the NMGRs. To synthesise the existing evidence on NMGRs through a narrative literature review, identifying key components, outcomes and implementation factors. Evaluate data from participants collected over an 18-month period across two acute hospitals, examining the perceived impact on knowledge development and professional practice. Integrate findings from the literature and empirical evaluation to identify the mechanisms underpinning effective NMGRs implementation. To develop evidence-informed recommendations to support the sustainability, scalability and wider adoption of NMGRs. Inform the future viability and sustainment of NMGRs. It is envisaged that the evidence gathered from both the literature review and evaluation forms will inform the viability of developing future NMGRs and scalability across other Nursing and Midwifery disciplines in the region. The methodology included a narrative literature review and an evaluation study. This involved 953 NMGRs participants and 398 evaluation forms were completed, with participants identifying a self-reported increase in their knowledge. Seven emerging themes were identified in the literature: Knowledge, Continuous Professional Development, Case Study, Resources and Timelines, Presenter Guidelines, Leadership/Management, Support and Culture. Almost 96% of all attendees agreed/strongly agreed that NMGRs were valuable in developing new knowledge for practice. The literature identified that knowledge attainment was increased, while also enhancing nurses and midwives CPD development. NMGRs have been identified as a successful way to share clinical and professional expertise. Although acknowledged as a useful approach to educating Nursing and Midwifery professionals, evidence regarding their implementation remains limited, particularly in relation to Midwifery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of CME
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/28338073.2026.2730792
Primary Topic
Health Sciences Research and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nursing and Midwifery Grand Rounds Two Acute Hospitals

Jeremiah Nally, Gráinne Keena
Journal of CME
Health Sciences Research and Education
article

Nursing and Midwifery Grand Rounds Two Acute Hospitals

Jeremiah Nally, Gráinne Keena
article en

Abstract

Nursing and Midwifery Grand Rounds (NMGR) have been well recognised internationally. Within an Irish context, there is a dearth of evidence and a lack of data relating to the impact of NMGRs from a Nursing and Midwifery perspective. The aim of this article is to identify the concepts relating to the successful implementation of the NMGRs. To synthesise the existing evidence on NMGRs through a narrative literature review, identifying key components, outcomes and implementation factors. Evaluate data from participants collected over an 18-month period across two acute hospitals, examining the perceived impact on knowledge development and professional practice. Integrate findings from the literature and empirical evaluation to identify the mechanisms underpinning effective NMGRs implementation. To develop evidence-informed recommendations to support the sustainability, scalability and wider adoption of NMGRs. Inform the future viability and sustainment of NMGRs. It is envisaged that the evidence gathered from both the literature review and evaluation forms will inform the viability of developing future NMGRs and scalability across other Nursing and Midwifery disciplines in the region. The methodology included a narrative literature review and an evaluation study. This involved 953 NMGRs participants and 398 evaluation forms were completed, with participants identifying a self-reported increase in their knowledge. Seven emerging themes were identified in the literature: Knowledge, Continuous Professional Development, Case Study, Resources and Timelines, Presenter Guidelines, Leadership/Management, Support and Culture. Almost 96% of all attendees agreed/strongly agreed that NMGRs were valuable in developing new knowledge for practice. The literature identified that knowledge attainment was increased, while also enhancing nurses and midwives CPD development. NMGRs have been identified as a successful way to share clinical and professional expertise. Although acknowledged as a useful approach to educating Nursing and Midwifery professionals, evidence regarding their implementation remains limited, particularly in relation to Midwifery.

Journal of CMEVol. 15(1)
Health Service Executive (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Health Sciences Research and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Nursing and Midwifery Grand Rounds Two Acute Hospitals — Jeremiah Nally, Gráinne Keena · Journal of CME (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS