Neoliberalism Against the Managerial University

ABSTRACT Critical work on higher education policy and governance often conflates neoliberalism and managerialism, reflecting their close association in contemporary universities. The neoliberal drive to produce market‐like outcomes has created the conditions for managerialism to flourish, with centralised accountability and control mechanisms justified on ostensibly neoliberal grounds. However, we draw on foundational neoliberal thinkers to argue that managerial practices reintroduce the knowledge and incentive problems that markets are intended to solve. The same line of argument provides positive reason to prefer collegial governance on neoliberal grounds: decision‐making power can be aligned with relevant knowledge, while shared decision rights and peer scrutiny can constrain opportunism and create accountability for academics and managers. Without offering a fully specified governance model, we conclude that collegial governance is a more promising response to university information and incentive problems than centralised managerial control, even when neoliberal premises are accepted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education Quarterly
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.70182
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neoliberalism Against the Managerial University

Brad R. Taylor, Anita Louise Wheeldon
Higher Education Quarterly
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

Neoliberalism Against the Managerial University

Brad R. Taylor, Anita Louise Wheeldon
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Critical work on higher education policy and governance often conflates neoliberalism and managerialism, reflecting their close association in contemporary universities. The neoliberal drive to produce market‐like outcomes has created the conditions for managerialism to flourish, with centralised accountability and control mechanisms justified on ostensibly neoliberal grounds. However, we draw on foundational neoliberal thinkers to argue that managerial practices reintroduce the knowledge and incentive problems that markets are intended to solve. The same line of argument provides positive reason to prefer collegial governance on neoliberal grounds: decision‐making power can be aligned with relevant knowledge, while shared decision rights and peer scrutiny can constrain opportunism and create accountability for academics and managers. Without offering a fully specified governance model, we conclude that collegial governance is a more promising response to university information and incentive problems than centralised managerial control, even when neoliberal premises are accepted.

Higher Education QuarterlyVol. 81(1)
University of Southern Queensland (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon