Defining AI Literature: Data-Driven Genetic Mode and Collaborative Turn

As data-driven systems have entered literary production, the label AI Literature has come to encompass practices that differ in how computational systems participate in composition. This article addresses this definitional instability through two complementary concepts: the data-driven genetic mode and the collaborative turn. The first identifies a transgeneric category of works whose production involves systems that learn patterns from data, while requiring intentional human organization and poetic or interpretive relevance. The second describes an asymmetrical redistribution of literary production across human and computational operations, without implying co-authorship or equal intentionality. A historical reconstruction of documented works from 2016 to 2026 traces this field from statistical and custom neural systems to pretrained Transformers and conversational interfaces. Rather than showing a replacement of human authorship by autonomous systems, this trajectory reveals growing experimentation with relations among models, archives, interfaces, editorial procedures, and human competencies. The article describes AI Literature as a historically coherent but technically heterogeneous field of literary practice. These works do not delegate writing to automated systems: they engage AI critically, using literary practice as a way to deconstruct technological tools.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Preprints.org
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202611.0176.v1
Primary Topic
Literary and Philosophical Studies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Defining AI Literature: Data-Driven Genetic Mode and Collaborative Turn

Daniel Raffini
Preprints.org
Literary and Philosophical Studies
preprint

Defining AI Literature: Data-Driven Genetic Mode and Collaborative Turn

Daniel Raffini
preprint en

Abstract

As data-driven systems have entered literary production, the label AI Literature has come to encompass practices that differ in how computational systems participate in composition. This article addresses this definitional instability through two complementary concepts: the data-driven genetic mode and the collaborative turn. The first identifies a transgeneric category of works whose production involves systems that learn patterns from data, while requiring intentional human organization and poetic or interpretive relevance. The second describes an asymmetrical redistribution of literary production across human and computational operations, without implying co-authorship or equal intentionality. A historical reconstruction of documented works from 2016 to 2026 traces this field from statistical and custom neural systems to pretrained Transformers and conversational interfaces. Rather than showing a replacement of human authorship by autonomous systems, this trajectory reveals growing experimentation with relations among models, archives, interfaces, editorial procedures, and human competencies. The article describes AI Literature as a historically coherent but technically heterogeneous field of literary practice. These works do not delegate writing to automated systems: they engage AI critically, using literary practice as a way to deconstruct technological tools.

Preprints.org
Literary and Philosophical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon