Association of Self‐Reported Clinical Behavior With Guideline Adherence in Schizophrenia and Major Depressive Disorder After Guideline Education

BACKGROUND: The Effectiveness of Guidelines for Dissemination and Education in Psychiatric Treatment (EGUIDE) project is a nationwide Japanese educational program promoting guideline-concordant pharmacotherapy for schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (MDD). Psychiatrists' self-reported clinical behavior (CB) scores after EGUIDE training are partially associated with objective quality indicators of specific practices. However, their association with comprehensive objective measures of overall guideline adherence remains unclear. METHODS: This multicenter observational study included 1897 EGUIDE-trained psychiatrists. CB was assessed online immediately after training. The Guideline Adherence Rate (GAR) was calculated for 5328 patients with schizophrenia and 3538 patients with MDD whose discharge records were linked to their psychiatrist's CB score. Associations were evaluated using unadjusted patient-level Spearman correlations, without modeling clustering within psychiatrists or institutions. Sensitivity analyses aggregated the data to the psychiatrist-year level, adjusted for institution type, psychiatrist experience, and patient age, and used generalized estimating equations (GEE) to correct the patient-level inference for clustering. RESULTS: CB scores showed positive but very weak correlations with GAR (schizophrenia, ρ = 0.09-0.14; MDD, ρ = 0.08-0.11; all p < 0.001). Squared coefficients (approximately 0.006-0.020) indicated that CB scores accounted for < 2% of the rank-order variation in GAR. These associations remained statistically significant in psychiatrist-year-level, covariate-adjusted, and clustering-corrected (GEE) sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Post-training self-reported CB scores were weakly associated with patient-level GAR. Given the cross-sectional, unadjusted analysis and the non-independence of patients treated by the same psychiatrist, these findings do not establish CB as a reliable proxy for actual clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000022645.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/npr2.70179
Primary Topic
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of Self‐Reported Clinical Behavior With Guideline Adherence in Schizophrenia and Major Depressive Disorder After Guideline Education

Koichiro Watanabe, Toshiaki Onitsuka, Takashi Tsuboi, Shinichiro Ochi et al.
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
article

Association of Self‐Reported Clinical Behavior With Guideline Adherence in Schizophrenia and Major Depressive Disorder After Guideline Education

Koichiro Watanabe, Toshiaki Onitsuka, Takashi Tsuboi, Shinichiro Ochi, Ken Inada, Ryota Hashimoto, Kazuhiko Yamamuro, Hikaru Hori, Yusuke Arai, Junya Matsumoto, Kazutaka Ohi, Yasushi Kawamata, Norio Yasui‐Furukori, Toru Horinouchi, Keisuke Mori
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Effectiveness of Guidelines for Dissemination and Education in Psychiatric Treatment (EGUIDE) project is a nationwide Japanese educational program promoting guideline-concordant pharmacotherapy for schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (MDD). Psychiatrists' self-reported clinical behavior (CB) scores after EGUIDE training are partially associated with objective quality indicators of specific practices. However, their association with comprehensive objective measures of overall guideline adherence remains unclear. METHODS: This multicenter observational study included 1897 EGUIDE-trained psychiatrists. CB was assessed online immediately after training. The Guideline Adherence Rate (GAR) was calculated for 5328 patients with schizophrenia and 3538 patients with MDD whose discharge records were linked to their psychiatrist's CB score. Associations were evaluated using unadjusted patient-level Spearman correlations, without modeling clustering within psychiatrists or institutions. Sensitivity analyses aggregated the data to the psychiatrist-year level, adjusted for institution type, psychiatrist experience, and patient age, and used generalized estimating equations (GEE) to correct the patient-level inference for clustering. RESULTS: CB scores showed positive but very weak correlations with GAR (schizophrenia, ρ = 0.09-0.14; MDD, ρ = 0.08-0.11; all p < 0.001). Squared coefficients (approximately 0.006-0.020) indicated that CB scores accounted for < 2% of the rank-order variation in GAR. These associations remained statistically significant in psychiatrist-year-level, covariate-adjusted, and clustering-corrected (GEE) sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Post-training self-reported CB scores were weakly associated with patient-level GAR. Given the cross-sectional, unadjusted analysis and the non-independence of patients treated by the same psychiatrist, these findings do not establish CB as a reliable proxy for actual clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000022645.

Neuropsychopharmacology ReportsVol. 46(4)
Jikei University School of Medicine (JP), Shinshu University (JP), Kyorin University (JP), Hokkaido University (JP), Fukuoka University (JP), National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP), National Institute of Mental Health (JP), Gifu University (JP), Ehime University (JP), National Hospital Organization Sakakibara Hospital (JP), Kitasato University (JP), Nara Medical University (JP), Dokkyo Medical University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon