Association between self-reported resistance-exercise frequency and abdominal adiposity among Chinese adults: a cross-sectional study

Background Resistance exercise is included in adult physical activity recommendations, but the weekly frequency associated with abdominal adiposity in free-living adults remains unknown. We examined the association between self-reported weekly resistance-exercise frequency and abdominal adiposity; an exploratory secondary analysis compared ≥3 days/week with 2 days/week. Methods This single-center cross-sectional study analyzed 913 Chinese adults selected from the 3,411 adults consecutively screened at the Health Examination Center of Taizhou People’s Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University between November 2025 and July 2026. Self-reported resistance exercise was grouped as 0, 1, 2, or ≥3 days/week. Body roundness index (BRI) was the primary outcome, with waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) as the secondary outcomes. Multivariable linear regression analyses with heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors were adjusted for age, sex, aerobic moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), sedentary time, smoking history, and alcohol consumption. The primary analysis used complete cases; multiple imputation was used to evaluate robustness in the 2,958 participants remaining after clinical exclusions, alongside additional sensitivity analyses. Results Of the 913 participants, 613 (67.14%) reported no weekly resistance exercise, 90 (9.86%) reported 1 day/week, 96 (10.51%) reported 2 days/week, and 114 (12.49%) reported ≥3 days/week. In the fully adjusted model, BRI was lower among participants reporting 2 days/week (β, −0.24; 95% CI, −0.46 to −0.03; p = 0.03) and ≥3 days/week (β, −0.39; 95% CI, −0.58 to −0.20; p < 0.01) than among those reporting 0 days/week; the association for 1 day/week was not statistically significant ( p = 0.16). The exploratory comparison of ≥3 versus 2 days/week yielded an estimated difference of −0.15 BRI units (95% CI, −0.40 to 0.11; p = 0.26). Waist circumference and the WHtR showed similar patterns, whereas the association with BMI was weaker. Multiple-imputation estimates remained inverse, while estimates in the smaller extended-covariate subset were attenuated and imprecise. Conclusion In this cross-sectional sample, self-reported resistance exercise on 2 and ≥3 days/week was associated with lower BRI and waist-based anthropometric measures than 0 days/week. The complete-case estimate comparing ≥3 with 2 days/week was imprecise, and sensitivity analyses yielded variable estimates. The substantially higher reported aerobic activity among participants reporting more frequent resistance exercise may limit the extent to which the observed association can be attributed to resistance exercise alone. These data do not establish a causal or frequency-specific effect, an optimal resistance-exercise frequency, or an additional benefit of exercising more than 2 days/week.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1974066
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association between self-reported resistance-exercise frequency and abdominal adiposity among Chinese adults: a cross-sectional study

樊燕, 王采, Yue Shi
Frontiers in Public Health
Physical Activity and Health
article

Association between self-reported resistance-exercise frequency and abdominal adiposity among Chinese adults: a cross-sectional study

樊燕, 王采, Yue Shi
article en

Abstract

Background Resistance exercise is included in adult physical activity recommendations, but the weekly frequency associated with abdominal adiposity in free-living adults remains unknown. We examined the association between self-reported weekly resistance-exercise frequency and abdominal adiposity; an exploratory secondary analysis compared ≥3 days/week with 2 days/week. Methods This single-center cross-sectional study analyzed 913 Chinese adults selected from the 3,411 adults consecutively screened at the Health Examination Center of Taizhou People’s Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University between November 2025 and July 2026. Self-reported resistance exercise was grouped as 0, 1, 2, or ≥3 days/week. Body roundness index (BRI) was the primary outcome, with waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) as the secondary outcomes. Multivariable linear regression analyses with heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors were adjusted for age, sex, aerobic moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), sedentary time, smoking history, and alcohol consumption. The primary analysis used complete cases; multiple imputation was used to evaluate robustness in the 2,958 participants remaining after clinical exclusions, alongside additional sensitivity analyses. Results Of the 913 participants, 613 (67.14%) reported no weekly resistance exercise, 90 (9.86%) reported 1 day/week, 96 (10.51%) reported 2 days/week, and 114 (12.49%) reported ≥3 days/week. In the fully adjusted model, BRI was lower among participants reporting 2 days/week (β, −0.24; 95% CI, −0.46 to −0.03; p = 0.03) and ≥3 days/week (β, −0.39; 95% CI, −0.58 to −0.20; p < 0.01) than among those reporting 0 days/week; the association for 1 day/week was not statistically significant ( p = 0.16). The exploratory comparison of ≥3 versus 2 days/week yielded an estimated difference of −0.15 BRI units (95% CI, −0.40 to 0.11; p = 0.26). Waist circumference and the WHtR showed similar patterns, whereas the association with BMI was weaker. Multiple-imputation estimates remained inverse, while estimates in the smaller extended-covariate subset were attenuated and imprecise. Conclusion In this cross-sectional sample, self-reported resistance exercise on 2 and ≥3 days/week was associated with lower BRI and waist-based anthropometric measures than 0 days/week. The complete-case estimate comparing ≥3 with 2 days/week was imprecise, and sensitivity analyses yielded variable estimates. The substantially higher reported aerobic activity among participants reporting more frequent resistance exercise may limit the extent to which the observed association can be attributed to resistance exercise alone. These data do not establish a causal or frequency-specific effect, an optimal resistance-exercise frequency, or an additional benefit of exercising more than 2 days/week.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 14
Jiangsu Vocational College of Medicine (CN), The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Physical Activity and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon