Head-to-Head Comparison of Flortaucipir and MK6240 tau-PET to Detect Subtle Objective Cognitive Impairment in Clinically Unimpaired Individuals
Background and Objectives: Tau-PET is associated with subtle objective cognitive impairment (SOCI) in clinically unimpaired (CU) individuals, but whether the spatial patterns and strengths of these associations differ across tracers remains unclear. We performed a head-to-head comparison of [18F]MK6240 and [18F]flortaucipir to investigate their associations with SOCI in CU individuals. Methods: We cross-sectionally assessed CU participants from the HEAD study who underwent both tau-PET scans. Linear regressions examined associations between domain-specific cognition and tau burden using standardized uptake value ratios (SUVR) in regional and voxelwise analyses, alongside regional spatial extent of tauopathy (SEOT) measures. Tau burden was compared across groups representing different levels of SOCI. Models adjusted for age, sex, and education, with additional adjustment for amyloid-beta burden. Centiloid-stratified analyses examined associations across amyloid-beta burden levels. Results: Among 297 participants (mean [SD] age, 67.0 [8.4] years; 179 [60.3%] female), higher [18F]MK6240 SUVR was associated with poorer memory performance. Greater SEOT with either tracer was associated with poorer memory and showed nominal associations with executive dysfunction. Regional association strengths did not differ significantly between tracers, while SEOT yielded comparable or stronger associations than SUVR. Centiloid-stratified analyses revealed tau-cognition associations primarily at intermediate and high amyloid-beta burden. [18F]MK6240 showed more spatially extensive voxelwise associations with memory and across SOCI group comparisons. Regional analyses also yielded more statistically significant differences across SOCI groups with [18F]MK6240 than with flortaucipir. These differences were predominantly driven by participants meeting actuarial mild cognitive impairment criteria, who exhibited greater tau burden than groups with less pronounced psychometric impairment. Across tracers, SEOT yielded more consistently significant differences among SOCI groups than SUVR. Discussion: Both tracers showed associations with SOCI in CU individuals, with broadly comparable regional association strengths despite differences in the spatial extent and statistical significance of their findings. SEOT complemented SUVR by identifying additional significant associations and group differences. These findings suggest that tracer choice and quantification approach may influence the spatial distribution and statistical significance of observed tau-cognition relationships without necessarily altering their overall strength.
Authors
- Val J. Lowe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5612-1667)
- Aurélie Lebrun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6168-8964)
- Tharick Ali Pascoal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9057-8014)
- Marina Scop Medeiros (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4237-4565)
- Joseph Therriault (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7826-4781)
- Juan Fortea (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1340-638X)
- Guilherme Povala (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2023-6569)
- Cecilia Boccalini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3518-436X)
- Belén Pascual (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4467-7406)
- Nesrine Rahmouni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3081-8468)
- Pâmela C.L. Ferreira (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2134-9829)
- Emma Patrice Ruppert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5877-5472)
- Arthur C. Macedo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3957-0284)
- Tevy Chan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9134-5949)
- Brandon J. Hall (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4578-2033)
- Seyyed Ali Hosseini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7542-7541)
- Bruna Bellaver (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2212-3373)
- David N. Soleimani‐Meigooni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4197-3039)
- Suzanne L. Baker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0209-3127)
- Maxime Montembeault (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9369-0498)
- Firoza Zubeida Lussier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6877-4825)
- Lívia Amaral (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4488-763X)
- Cécile Tissot (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2711-3833)
- Étienne Aumont (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8997-7090)
- Gleb Bezgin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1069-9201)
- Brian Andrew Gordon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2109-2955)
- Pedro Rosa‐Neto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9116-1376)
- Juliana Beker Godoy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3754-6045)
- Hwamee Oh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1156-5704)
- Lydia Trudel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5593-7717)
- Rayan Mroué
- Andreia Rocha
- Delphine Oliva-Lopez
- Joseph Masdeu
- Jaime Fernandez-Arias
- Isabella Bizzi
Institutions
- Houston Methodist (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Brown University (US)
- Hospital de Sant Pau (ES)
- Methodist Hospital (US)
- McGill University (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- medRxiv
- Published
- 2026-11-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.11.01.26367030
- Primary Topic
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Type
- preprint