Conversational AIs and Mnemonic Distortion

Abstract Conversational AI agents designed to simulate interactions with deceased persons—referred to here as Interactive Personality Constructs of the Dead (IPCDs)—offer a novel and potentially highly valuable way to memorialise the deceased. But IPCDs could also undermine the goal of remembrance. This paper argues that IPCDs put users at risk of mnemonic distortion— an epistemic harm in which generated misrepresentations of the deceased become incorporated into our memory of the deceased, such that some of what subsequently shapes our conception of the deceased person originates in the IPCD rather than the deceased—reshaping or, at worst, replacing our memories of the person we hoped to remember. Such distortions are importantly distinct from imaginative engagement with the deceased or the testimony of others, which may also alter our memories of the deceased. The risk of mnemonic distortion is not inherent to IPCDs but rather contingent on design; the paper concludes by considering how this concern could inform recommendations for the design of IPCDs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Technology
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-026-01229-8
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conversational AIs and Mnemonic Distortion

Helena Ward
Philosophy & Technology
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Conversational AIs and Mnemonic Distortion

Helena Ward
article en

Abstract

Abstract Conversational AI agents designed to simulate interactions with deceased persons—referred to here as Interactive Personality Constructs of the Dead (IPCDs)—offer a novel and potentially highly valuable way to memorialise the deceased. But IPCDs could also undermine the goal of remembrance. This paper argues that IPCDs put users at risk of mnemonic distortion— an epistemic harm in which generated misrepresentations of the deceased become incorporated into our memory of the deceased, such that some of what subsequently shapes our conception of the deceased person originates in the IPCD rather than the deceased—reshaping or, at worst, replacing our memories of the person we hoped to remember. Such distortions are importantly distinct from imaginative engagement with the deceased or the testimony of others, which may also alter our memories of the deceased. The risk of mnemonic distortion is not inherent to IPCDs but rather contingent on design; the paper concludes by considering how this concern could inform recommendations for the design of IPCDs.

Philosophy & TechnologyVol. 39(4)
Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon