Response to Uncertainty and Social Threat: Impact on Mental Health (RUSH) Study Protocol

Background: Depression is frequently treatment-resistant, and its etiological underpinnings remain poorly understood. Chronic systemic inflammation may drive difficult-to-treat cases, yet prospective naturalistic studies among non-depressed individuals are needed to inform etiology and prevention. This protocol describes the R esponse to U ncertainty and S ocial Threat: Impact on Mental H ealth (RUSH) Study, a multi-week naturalistic stress paradigm comparing current sorority members (controls) to recruits experiencing social-evaluative threat—representing the first naturalistic test of the Social Signal Transduction Theory of Depression. Wave 1 (n=30) is complete; here we present feasibility data and Wave 2 modifications. Methods: Participants completed four visits: one before recruitment, one before and one after a single recruitment day (to assess acute reactivity), and one post-recruitment. At each visit, they completed surveys, a dried blood spot (DBS) to assess inflammatory markers, and a saliva sample to assess cortisol. Before and after the single recruitment day, they completed a computerized social approach/avoidance task. Ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) were completed five times daily for 4 days before and after recruitment and twice daily during the recruitment period (12 days), alongside continuous Oura Ring physiological monitoring. Results: No participant withdrew after Visit 1. Participants rated staff highly and all expressed willingness to participate again. A DBS was obtained in 98.2% of attempts; among these, sessions yielded a mean of 4.32 of five spots per session. Sufficient saliva was obtained in 89.0% of attempts. The overall EMA compliance rate was 79.7% (SD=20.8%), with recruits (M=87.7%, SD=14.6%) outperforming members (M=74.4%, SD=22.9%). However, participants found the pre- and post-recruitment EMA frequency to be burdensome, prompting consolidation in Wave 2. Ninety-seven percent submitted support figure photos, and AI-generated stranger photos were largely indistinguishable from real photographs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/psy.0000000000001546
Primary Topic
Stress Responses and Cortisol
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Response to Uncertainty and Social Threat: Impact on Mental Health (RUSH) Study Protocol

Annelise A. Madison, Seoyoon Chang, Lizbeth Benson, Lauren Y. Kim et al.
Psychosomatic Medicine
Stress Responses and Cortisol
article

Response to Uncertainty and Social Threat: Impact on Mental Health (RUSH) Study Protocol

Annelise A. Madison, Seoyoon Chang, Lizbeth Benson, Lauren Y. Kim, Maryam Altayeb, Jack Chermside
article en

Abstract

Background: Depression is frequently treatment-resistant, and its etiological underpinnings remain poorly understood. Chronic systemic inflammation may drive difficult-to-treat cases, yet prospective naturalistic studies among non-depressed individuals are needed to inform etiology and prevention. This protocol describes the R esponse to U ncertainty and S ocial Threat: Impact on Mental H ealth (RUSH) Study, a multi-week naturalistic stress paradigm comparing current sorority members (controls) to recruits experiencing social-evaluative threat—representing the first naturalistic test of the Social Signal Transduction Theory of Depression. Wave 1 (n=30) is complete; here we present feasibility data and Wave 2 modifications. Methods: Participants completed four visits: one before recruitment, one before and one after a single recruitment day (to assess acute reactivity), and one post-recruitment. At each visit, they completed surveys, a dried blood spot (DBS) to assess inflammatory markers, and a saliva sample to assess cortisol. Before and after the single recruitment day, they completed a computerized social approach/avoidance task. Ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) were completed five times daily for 4 days before and after recruitment and twice daily during the recruitment period (12 days), alongside continuous Oura Ring physiological monitoring. Results: No participant withdrew after Visit 1. Participants rated staff highly and all expressed willingness to participate again. A DBS was obtained in 98.2% of attempts; among these, sessions yielded a mean of 4.32 of five spots per session. Sufficient saliva was obtained in 89.0% of attempts. The overall EMA compliance rate was 79.7% (SD=20.8%), with recruits (M=87.7%, SD=14.6%) outperforming members (M=74.4%, SD=22.9%). However, participants found the pre- and post-recruitment EMA frequency to be burdensome, prompting consolidation in Wave 2. Ninety-seven percent submitted support figure photos, and AI-generated stranger photos were largely indistinguishable from real photographs.

Psychosomatic Medicine
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Stress Responses and Cortisol
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon