Assessing instrumental activities of daily living in people with mild‐to‐moderate dementia: Objective and subjective assessments and their cognitive correlates

Different methods of assessing instrumental activities of daily living (iADL) may show distinct relationships with cognition in dementia. This study investigated whether these relationships differed across objective, self-rated, and informant-rated assessments, with analyses of individual cognitive measures treated as exploratory. Thirty-seven people with mild-to-moderate dementia were recruited from National Health Service memory clinics in North Wales. Participants completed the objective Direct Assessment of Functional Status (DAFS), study-specific self-rated and informant-rated questionnaires based on the DAFS, and self-rated and informant-rated versions of the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ). Cognitive assessment included measures of executive function, attention, memory, and global cognition. Univariable and forced-entry multiple regression analyses were conducted with Holm-Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Objective iADL performance showed more frequent associations with cognition than questionnaire-based ratings. DAFS scores were associated with global cognition, immediate and delayed memory, Trail Making Test Part 4, and Design Fluency scores. In contrast, questionnaire measures showed few associations with cognition. FAQ self-ratings were associated with depressive symptoms, while FAQ informant ratings were associated with carer burden. In the multivariable model, global cognition remained the only significant cognitive predictor after correction. Across 20 comparisons with questionnaire-based iADL measures, correlations between cognition and the objective DAFS were larger in absolute magnitude, although only four differences remained significant after correction. The findings suggest that objective, self-rated, and informant-rated assessments may capture partially distinct aspects of everyday functioning and should not necessarily be considered interchangeable measures. Global cognitive measures may provide useful indicators of functional ability in mild-to-moderate dementia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuropsychology
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.70089
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing instrumental activities of daily living in people with mild‐to‐moderate dementia: Objective and subjective assessments and their cognitive correlates

Anthony Martyr
Journal of Neuropsychology
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Assessing instrumental activities of daily living in people with mild‐to‐moderate dementia: Objective and subjective assessments and their cognitive correlates

Anthony Martyr
article en

Abstract

Different methods of assessing instrumental activities of daily living (iADL) may show distinct relationships with cognition in dementia. This study investigated whether these relationships differed across objective, self-rated, and informant-rated assessments, with analyses of individual cognitive measures treated as exploratory. Thirty-seven people with mild-to-moderate dementia were recruited from National Health Service memory clinics in North Wales. Participants completed the objective Direct Assessment of Functional Status (DAFS), study-specific self-rated and informant-rated questionnaires based on the DAFS, and self-rated and informant-rated versions of the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ). Cognitive assessment included measures of executive function, attention, memory, and global cognition. Univariable and forced-entry multiple regression analyses were conducted with Holm-Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Objective iADL performance showed more frequent associations with cognition than questionnaire-based ratings. DAFS scores were associated with global cognition, immediate and delayed memory, Trail Making Test Part 4, and Design Fluency scores. In contrast, questionnaire measures showed few associations with cognition. FAQ self-ratings were associated with depressive symptoms, while FAQ informant ratings were associated with carer burden. In the multivariable model, global cognition remained the only significant cognitive predictor after correction. Across 20 comparisons with questionnaire-based iADL measures, correlations between cognition and the objective DAFS were larger in absolute magnitude, although only four differences remained significant after correction. The findings suggest that objective, self-rated, and informant-rated assessments may capture partially distinct aspects of everyday functioning and should not necessarily be considered interchangeable measures. Global cognitive measures may provide useful indicators of functional ability in mild-to-moderate dementia.

Journal of Neuropsychology
University of Exeter (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon