Longevity Medicine: Ethical Considerations

Longevity medicine raises an important ethical question: although advances in medical science may make it increasingly possible to extend human life, should interventions whose primary purpose is prolongation of life be pursued?This narrative ethical analysis examines longevity medicine through several established approaches to medical ethics, including deontology, consequentialism, practical wisdom, and the four commonly applied principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and social justice.The discussion distinguishes the increase in longevity that has unintentionally accompanied disease prevention and treatment from interventions whose primary intent is to prolong life.Particular attention is given to informed consent and uncertainty, the relationship between quantity and quality of life, potential harms associated with extending life, and the possibility that expensive longevity interventions could widen existing health inequities.The analysis also considers whether aging should be understood as a natural and inevitable process or as a condition to be treated.Ethical oversight and careful consideration of societal consequences are warranted as geroscience advances.Living longer has been among the enduring goals of medicine, but ethical evaluation should ensure that living better remains central to the pursuit of longevity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.118984
Primary Topic
Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Longevity Medicine: Ethical Considerations

John McGeehan, Rachel Blumberg
Cureus
Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
article

Longevity Medicine: Ethical Considerations

John McGeehan, Rachel Blumberg
article en

Abstract

Longevity medicine raises an important ethical question: although advances in medical science may make it increasingly possible to extend human life, should interventions whose primary purpose is prolongation of life be pursued?This narrative ethical analysis examines longevity medicine through several established approaches to medical ethics, including deontology, consequentialism, practical wisdom, and the four commonly applied principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and social justice.The discussion distinguishes the increase in longevity that has unintentionally accompanied disease prevention and treatment from interventions whose primary intent is to prolong life.Particular attention is given to informed consent and uncertainty, the relationship between quantity and quality of life, potential harms associated with extending life, and the possibility that expensive longevity interventions could widen existing health inequities.The analysis also considers whether aging should be understood as a natural and inevitable process or as a condition to be treated.Ethical oversight and careful consideration of societal consequences are warranted as geroscience advances.Living longer has been among the enduring goals of medicine, but ethical evaluation should ensure that living better remains central to the pursuit of longevity.

Cureus
Cooper Medical School of Rowan University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon