Experiences and perspectives of patients visiting Dutch emergency departments on opioid (mis)use: a qualitative interview study

Background and importance The increase in opioid prescribing and opioid-related harm is a public health concern in many Western countries. Physicians in the emergency department (ED) frequently prescribe opioids for acute pain and play a role in the acute management of opioid-related harm. Yet, patient perspectives on the role of the ED in opioid management remain largely unexplored. Objective This study aimed to explore how patients discharged from Dutch EDs with a new opioid prescription perceive ED opioid prescribing, the information and guidance they receive and the potential for opioid-related harm to inform safer opioid management in the ED. Design A qualitative interview study using semi-structured interviews. Settings and participants The study was conducted at two EDs in the Netherlands: Leiden University Medical Center (academic hospital) and Haaglanden Medical Center (teaching hospital). Adult patients (≥18 years) discharged from the ED with a new opioid prescription were recruited through purposive sampling. Patients (n=35) were interviewed either by telephone after discharge (n=28) or in person at the ED directly after discharge (n=7). Outcome measures and analysis Thematic analysis was performed to develop key themes reflecting patients9 experiences and perspectives towards opioid use and potential misuse, in relation to an ED visit. Results Three themes were developed from 35 interviews, encompassing: (1) Opioid prescribing practices at the ED; where patients described variable prescribing behaviours, limited information and lack of structured follow-up, (2) Navigating pain and dilemmas in opioid use; reflecting how acute pain drove opioid use despite concerns about side effects and stigma, (3) The perceived risk of opioid addiction after an ED visit; where patients acknowledged risks but often considered themselves protected by resilience, self-regulation and social support. Conclusion These findings show that while ED patients trust physicians’ prescribing, insufficient communication and aftercare leave them uncertain about safe opioid use and tapering. Implementing standardised, patient-centred discharge instructions and follow-up could strengthen safe opioid-prescribing practices at the ED, support patients in managing acute pain and may help to reduce the risk of long-term opioid-related harm.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-122049
Primary Topic
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiences and perspectives of patients visiting Dutch emergency departments on opioid (mis)use: a qualitative interview study

Viren Bahadoer, Hannah Ellerbroek, Arnt Schellekens, Cornelis Kramers et al.
BMJ Open
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
article

Experiences and perspectives of patients visiting Dutch emergency departments on opioid (mis)use: a qualitative interview study

Viren Bahadoer, Hannah Ellerbroek, Arnt Schellekens, Cornelis Kramers, Nicole Kraaijvanger, Albert Dahan, Merel van Loon, Charlotte ten Pas
article en

Abstract

Background and importance The increase in opioid prescribing and opioid-related harm is a public health concern in many Western countries. Physicians in the emergency department (ED) frequently prescribe opioids for acute pain and play a role in the acute management of opioid-related harm. Yet, patient perspectives on the role of the ED in opioid management remain largely unexplored. Objective This study aimed to explore how patients discharged from Dutch EDs with a new opioid prescription perceive ED opioid prescribing, the information and guidance they receive and the potential for opioid-related harm to inform safer opioid management in the ED. Design A qualitative interview study using semi-structured interviews. Settings and participants The study was conducted at two EDs in the Netherlands: Leiden University Medical Center (academic hospital) and Haaglanden Medical Center (teaching hospital). Adult patients (≥18 years) discharged from the ED with a new opioid prescription were recruited through purposive sampling. Patients (n=35) were interviewed either by telephone after discharge (n=28) or in person at the ED directly after discharge (n=7). Outcome measures and analysis Thematic analysis was performed to develop key themes reflecting patients9 experiences and perspectives towards opioid use and potential misuse, in relation to an ED visit. Results Three themes were developed from 35 interviews, encompassing: (1) Opioid prescribing practices at the ED; where patients described variable prescribing behaviours, limited information and lack of structured follow-up, (2) Navigating pain and dilemmas in opioid use; reflecting how acute pain drove opioid use despite concerns about side effects and stigma, (3) The perceived risk of opioid addiction after an ED visit; where patients acknowledged risks but often considered themselves protected by resilience, self-regulation and social support. Conclusion These findings show that while ED patients trust physicians’ prescribing, insufficient communication and aftercare leave them uncertain about safe opioid use and tapering. Implementing standardised, patient-centred discharge instructions and follow-up could strengthen safe opioid-prescribing practices at the ED, support patients in managing acute pain and may help to reduce the risk of long-term opioid-related harm.

BMJ OpenVol. 16(11)
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis (NL), Medisch Centrum Haaglanden (NL), Nijmegen Institute for Scientist Practitioners in Addiction (NL), Centre for Human Drug Research (NL), Stichting Haaglanden Medisch Centrum (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon