Agricultural Subsidy Policies and Sustainable Development in China: The Effect of Agricultural Subsidies on Farmers' Chemical Fertilizer Application

ABSTRACT Using 2013–2020 China Rural Microeconomic Data, we employ the staggered difference‐in‐differences method to examine the effects of agricultural subsidy reform on farmers' chemical fertilizer (CF) application intensity. We find that the reform significantly reduces CF application intensity: farmers in reformed provinces apply 14.2% less CF than those in non‐reformed provinces. The effect is more pronounced among elderly farmers, low education groups, high‐income groups, and agriculture‐dependent households. Three main channels underlie these effects: first, the provision of greater subsidy incentives to large‐scale farmers; second, the substitution of CF with agricultural machinery; and third, the promotion of organic fertilizer as a substitute for CF. Therefore, designing agricultural subsidy policies that target large‐scale farmers and incentivize green production practices may be an effective way to balance grain production with environmental protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agribusiness
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.70172
Primary Topic
Agricultural Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agricultural Subsidy Policies and Sustainable Development in China: The Effect of Agricultural Subsidies on Farmers' Chemical Fertilizer Application

J. Zhang, Xue Ping, Wei Jia
2 links
Agribusiness
Agricultural Economics and Policy
article

Agricultural Subsidy Policies and Sustainable Development in China: The Effect of Agricultural Subsidies on Farmers' Chemical Fertilizer Application

J. Zhang, Xue Ping, Wei Jia
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Using 2013–2020 China Rural Microeconomic Data, we employ the staggered difference‐in‐differences method to examine the effects of agricultural subsidy reform on farmers' chemical fertilizer (CF) application intensity. We find that the reform significantly reduces CF application intensity: farmers in reformed provinces apply 14.2% less CF than those in non‐reformed provinces. The effect is more pronounced among elderly farmers, low education groups, high‐income groups, and agriculture‐dependent households. Three main channels underlie these effects: first, the provision of greater subsidy incentives to large‐scale farmers; second, the substitution of CF with agricultural machinery; and third, the promotion of organic fertilizer as a substitute for CF. Therefore, designing agricultural subsidy policies that target large‐scale farmers and incentivize green production practices may be an effective way to balance grain production with environmental protection.

Agribusiness
Central University of Finance and Economics (CN), Peking University (CN), Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development (CN), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program
Zero hunger, Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Agricultural Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon