Furthering research geography: continuing the discussion on global inequity in spinal cord stimulation
We thank Mistry and Dey for their thoughtful comments in their letter,[1][1] ‘Beyond research geography: interpreting global inequity in spinal cord stimulation (SCS)’, on our systematic review and meta-analysis examining the global distribution of SCS research. Their letter raises several
Authors
- Peter D. Vu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6056-7250)
- Noushad Mamun (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7417-2698)
- Ryan Steven D'Souza (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4601-9837)
- Kate J. Krause (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9473-0335)
- Lei Feng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1165-8046)
- Saba Javed (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1028-8904)
- Billy Huh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2825-9474)
Institutions
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- Harvard University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
- Published
- 2026-11-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2026-108576
- Primary Topic
- Pain Management and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00