AI as assistant, not creative co-author: AI imaginaries among Social Cartoon Influencers in Vietnam

Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) have intensified debates about automation, authorship, and labour across creative industries. Yet these discussions are often dominated by disruption and replacement narratives, leaving limited attention to how creators interpret and negotiate AI in everyday practice, particularly in non-Western contexts. This paper examines how Social Cartoon Influencers (SCIs) in Vietnam interpret and use GenAI within their routine creative production. The study combines semi-structured interviews and contextual observations of production workflows through the lens of AI imaginaries. Findings reveal that creators position AI as a creative assistant rather than a co-author, using it for ideation, optimisation and routine tasks, while reserving final authorship for humans. The clear human-AI boundary results from concerns surrounding situated notions of authenticity and ‘national tone’. The paper argues that AI adoption is shaped by negotiated boundaries around authorship, authenticity, and cultural legitimacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communication Research and Practice
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2026.2757520
Primary Topic
Digital Media and Visual Art
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI as assistant, not creative co-author: AI imaginaries among Social Cartoon Influencers in Vietnam

Haiqing Yu, Thanh Tran
3 links
Communication Research and Practice
Digital Media and Visual Art
article

AI as assistant, not creative co-author: AI imaginaries among Social Cartoon Influencers in Vietnam

Haiqing Yu, Thanh Tran
article en

Abstract

Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) have intensified debates about automation, authorship, and labour across creative industries. Yet these discussions are often dominated by disruption and replacement narratives, leaving limited attention to how creators interpret and negotiate AI in everyday practice, particularly in non-Western contexts. This paper examines how Social Cartoon Influencers (SCIs) in Vietnam interpret and use GenAI within their routine creative production. The study combines semi-structured interviews and contextual observations of production workflows through the lens of AI imaginaries. Findings reveal that creators position AI as a creative assistant rather than a co-author, using it for ideation, optimisation and routine tasks, while reserving final authorship for humans. The clear human-AI boundary results from concerns surrounding situated notions of authenticity and ‘national tone’. The paper argues that AI adoption is shaped by negotiated boundaries around authorship, authenticity, and cultural legitimacy.

Communication Research and Practice
RMIT University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Digital Media and Visual Art
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon