QRA and Reliability Optimization in Gas Pipeline Construction using Fault Tree Analysis A Scenario-Based Construction-Phase Risk Assessment Framework

Gas pipeline construction comprises route preparation, excavation or horizontal directional drilling (HDD), pipe transportation and stringing, lifting, welding, non-destructive testing, coating, lowering-in, backfilling, testing and tie-in activities. These operations may interact with existing buried utilities and live hydrocarbon systems, creating pathways to pipeline damage, loss of containment, fire, explosion and struck-by injury. This study develops a construction-phase risk assessment framework that integrates task-based hazard identification and risk assessment (HIRARC), Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), data-screened Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA), and reliability improvement. Four top-event scenarios are formulated: (i) mechanical damage to an existing buried gas pipeline during excavation; (ii) fire or explosion during hot work; (iii) unexpected hydrocarbon release during construction or tie-in; and (iv) a dropped pipe or load striking a person during lifting. Preliminary fault trees separate initiating mechanisms, failed safeguards and exposure conditions, thereby clarifying the AND/OR relationships that must be validated. Documentary triangulation uses the supplied project report, relevant accident-investigation records, and technical guidance on FTA, excavation and hot-work controls. The industrial visit to Oil Terminal is treated only as contextual familiarisation; the visit photographs do not demonstrate the occurrence of any modelled event. The analysis identifies utility-location assurance, permit-to-dig, positive isolation, gas testing, hot-work control, lifting integrity, exclusion zones and communication as critical barrier themes. Since task-specific failure rates, exposure denominators and consequence parameters were not supplied, numerical probabilities, risk contours and risk-reduction percentages are intentionally not reported. The principal contribution is a transparent, auditable framework for validating construction-related fault trees and populating a QRA when reliable project data become available.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48175/ijarsct-40530
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

QRA and Reliability Optimization in Gas Pipeline Construction using Fault Tree Analysis A Scenario-Based Construction-Phase Risk Assessment Framework

Syed Alfaiz Ali Sanjhvi Singh Parihar, Vivek Kumar and Prof. Pravin Tathod Shinde, Sandesh Kailas Chavan Kajal Patel
International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

QRA and Reliability Optimization in Gas Pipeline Construction using Fault Tree Analysis A Scenario-Based Construction-Phase Risk Assessment Framework

Syed Alfaiz Ali Sanjhvi Singh Parihar, Vivek Kumar and Prof. Pravin Tathod Shinde, Sandesh Kailas Chavan Kajal Patel
article en

Abstract

Gas pipeline construction comprises route preparation, excavation or horizontal directional drilling (HDD), pipe transportation and stringing, lifting, welding, non-destructive testing, coating, lowering-in, backfilling, testing and tie-in activities. These operations may interact with existing buried utilities and live hydrocarbon systems, creating pathways to pipeline damage, loss of containment, fire, explosion and struck-by injury. This study develops a construction-phase risk assessment framework that integrates task-based hazard identification and risk assessment (HIRARC), Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), data-screened Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA), and reliability improvement. Four top-event scenarios are formulated: (i) mechanical damage to an existing buried gas pipeline during excavation; (ii) fire or explosion during hot work; (iii) unexpected hydrocarbon release during construction or tie-in; and (iv) a dropped pipe or load striking a person during lifting. Preliminary fault trees separate initiating mechanisms, failed safeguards and exposure conditions, thereby clarifying the AND/OR relationships that must be validated. Documentary triangulation uses the supplied project report, relevant accident-investigation records, and technical guidance on FTA, excavation and hot-work controls. The industrial visit to Oil Terminal is treated only as contextual familiarisation; the visit photographs do not demonstrate the occurrence of any modelled event. The analysis identifies utility-location assurance, permit-to-dig, positive isolation, gas testing, hot-work control, lifting integrity, exclusion zones and communication as critical barrier themes. Since task-specific failure rates, exposure denominators and consequence parameters were not supplied, numerical probabilities, risk contours and risk-reduction percentages are intentionally not reported. The principal contribution is a transparent, auditable framework for validating construction-related fault trees and populating a QRA when reliable project data become available.

International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology
IPS Academy (IN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon