AL-adjusted Km residual groups and anterior chamber depth heterogeneity in patients with age-related cataract

To characterize the nonlinear relationship between axial length (AL) and mean keratometry (Km) and evaluate whether Km residual groups identify anterior chamber depth (ACD) differences beyond conventional AL-based stratification. This retrospective cross-sectional study included 15,082 eyes with age-related cataract undergoing swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometry; one eye was randomly selected per participant. Segmented regression identified the AL–Km breakpoint, and a generalized additive model (GAM) modeled the AL–Km trajectory. Associations between Km residual groups and ACD were assessed using multivariable linear regression adjusted for AL, lens thickness (LT), central corneal thickness (CCT), age, sex, and group-by-AL interactions. Model comparisons included raw Km, residual groups, and nonlinear models. Robustness was assessed by bootstrap resampling and AL-conditional residual standardization. The AL–Km relationship was nonlinear, with a breakpoint at 24.20 mm (95% CI, 24.15–24.25 mm). GAM residuals classified 2,247 eyes (14.9%) as low-Km group (LKG), 10,579 (70.1%) as coupled-Km group (CKG), and 2,256 (15.0%) as high-Km group (HKG). Compared with CKG, LKG was associated with shallower ACD (β = −0.125 mm), whereas HKG was associated with deeper ACD (β = 0.115 mm; both P < 0.001). In 10-fold cross-validation, the model including the categorical Km residual group had a lower CV RMSE than the model including raw Km (0.2454 vs. 0.2515 mm), but a higher CV RMSE than the nonlinear models (0.2331–0.2360 mm). The categorical association between Km residual group and ACD was strongest at 22 ≤ AL < 24 mm (Cramer’s V = 0.146). At AL ≥ 26 mm, unadjusted ACD differences among the three groups were not significant ( P = 0.404), whereas adjusted analysis showed a LKG–CKG difference (− 0.115 mm) but no HKG–CKG difference (+ 0.005 mm). AL-conditional residual standardization yielded 95.4% agreement with the primary classification. The AL–Km relationship is nonlinear, with a cohort-specific change point around 24–24.5 mm. Km residual groups were associated with ACD differences among eyes with similar AL that were not fully captured by AL stratification alone, and provide an interpretable representation of individual deviation from the population AL–Km relationship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Ophthalmology
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-026-05468-3
Primary Topic
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AL-adjusted Km residual groups and anterior chamber depth heterogeneity in patients with age-related cataract

Rong Zhang, Yingping Chen, Mingxin Zhao, Qun Tang et al.
BMC Ophthalmology
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
article

AL-adjusted Km residual groups and anterior chamber depth heterogeneity in patients with age-related cataract

Rong Zhang, Yingping Chen, Mingxin Zhao, Qun Tang, Xiangyu Ye, Haiyan Mi, Zhongjiang Chen
article en

Abstract

To characterize the nonlinear relationship between axial length (AL) and mean keratometry (Km) and evaluate whether Km residual groups identify anterior chamber depth (ACD) differences beyond conventional AL-based stratification. This retrospective cross-sectional study included 15,082 eyes with age-related cataract undergoing swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometry; one eye was randomly selected per participant. Segmented regression identified the AL–Km breakpoint, and a generalized additive model (GAM) modeled the AL–Km trajectory. Associations between Km residual groups and ACD were assessed using multivariable linear regression adjusted for AL, lens thickness (LT), central corneal thickness (CCT), age, sex, and group-by-AL interactions. Model comparisons included raw Km, residual groups, and nonlinear models. Robustness was assessed by bootstrap resampling and AL-conditional residual standardization. The AL–Km relationship was nonlinear, with a breakpoint at 24.20 mm (95% CI, 24.15–24.25 mm). GAM residuals classified 2,247 eyes (14.9%) as low-Km group (LKG), 10,579 (70.1%) as coupled-Km group (CKG), and 2,256 (15.0%) as high-Km group (HKG). Compared with CKG, LKG was associated with shallower ACD (β = −0.125 mm), whereas HKG was associated with deeper ACD (β = 0.115 mm; both P < 0.001). In 10-fold cross-validation, the model including the categorical Km residual group had a lower CV RMSE than the model including raw Km (0.2454 vs. 0.2515 mm), but a higher CV RMSE than the nonlinear models (0.2331–0.2360 mm). The categorical association between Km residual group and ACD was strongest at 22 ≤ AL < 24 mm (Cramer’s V = 0.146). At AL ≥ 26 mm, unadjusted ACD differences among the three groups were not significant ( P = 0.404), whereas adjusted analysis showed a LKG–CKG difference (− 0.115 mm) but no HKG–CKG difference (+ 0.005 mm). AL-conditional residual standardization yielded 95.4% agreement with the primary classification. The AL–Km relationship is nonlinear, with a cohort-specific change point around 24–24.5 mm. Km residual groups were associated with ACD differences among eyes with similar AL that were not fully captured by AL stratification alone, and provide an interpretable representation of individual deviation from the population AL–Km relationship.

BMC Ophthalmology
Fujian Medical University (CN), Xiamen University (CN), He Eye Hospital (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon