Diagnostic Accuracy of Gallbladder Dimensions on Ultrasound for Acute Cholecystitis

INTRODUCTION: Acute cholecystitis is commonly evaluated with ultrasound using established sonographic features. The Tokyo Guidelines 2018 recognise gallbladder enlargement as a characteristic imaging finding; however, the diagnostic value of quantitative gallbladder dimensions remains uncertain. This study evaluated whether gallbladder length (GBL), width (GBW), and volume (GBV) provide additional diagnostic value beyond conventional ultrasound features. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study included 176 patients undergoing abdominal ultrasound between 2019 and 2024: 88 with histopathologically confirmed acute calculous cholecystitis and 88 age- and sex-matched controls. Gallbladder dimensions were independently measured by two blinded readers, with GBV approximated using an ellipsoid formula. Logistic regression, nested model comparisons, interobserver reliability and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed. RESULTS: All conventional sonographic features and gallbladder measurements were significantly associated with cholecystitis on univariate analysis. After adjustment for age, sex, weight and conventional sonographic features, GBL remained independently associated with cholecystitis (adjusted OR 1.045, 95% CI 1.014-1.077; p = 0.004) and improved model fit. GBV also provided incremental value (p = 0.020), whereas GBW did not (p = 0.44). Interobserver reliability was excellent for GBL (ICC 0.94), GBW (0.91) and GBV (0.93). GBL demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance (AUC 0.76), followed by GBV (0.74) and GBW (0.63). A 71-mm GBL cutoff yielded 72% sensitivity and 71% specificity. CONCLUSION: GBL and GBV provide incremental diagnostic information beyond conventional sonographic features. GBL is the strongest quantitative marker and may serve as a reproducible adjunct to established ultrasound findings. External validation of the proposed thresholds is required before broader clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.70217
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Accuracy of Gallbladder Dimensions on Ultrasound for Acute Cholecystitis

Victor Ken On Chang, Wasim Awal, Sameer Khan, Zicheng Weng
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

Diagnostic Accuracy of Gallbladder Dimensions on Ultrasound for Acute Cholecystitis

Victor Ken On Chang, Wasim Awal, Sameer Khan, Zicheng Weng
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Acute cholecystitis is commonly evaluated with ultrasound using established sonographic features. The Tokyo Guidelines 2018 recognise gallbladder enlargement as a characteristic imaging finding; however, the diagnostic value of quantitative gallbladder dimensions remains uncertain. This study evaluated whether gallbladder length (GBL), width (GBW), and volume (GBV) provide additional diagnostic value beyond conventional ultrasound features. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study included 176 patients undergoing abdominal ultrasound between 2019 and 2024: 88 with histopathologically confirmed acute calculous cholecystitis and 88 age- and sex-matched controls. Gallbladder dimensions were independently measured by two blinded readers, with GBV approximated using an ellipsoid formula. Logistic regression, nested model comparisons, interobserver reliability and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed. RESULTS: All conventional sonographic features and gallbladder measurements were significantly associated with cholecystitis on univariate analysis. After adjustment for age, sex, weight and conventional sonographic features, GBL remained independently associated with cholecystitis (adjusted OR 1.045, 95% CI 1.014-1.077; p = 0.004) and improved model fit. GBV also provided incremental value (p = 0.020), whereas GBW did not (p = 0.44). Interobserver reliability was excellent for GBL (ICC 0.94), GBW (0.91) and GBV (0.93). GBL demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance (AUC 0.76), followed by GBV (0.74) and GBW (0.63). A 71-mm GBL cutoff yielded 72% sensitivity and 71% specificity. CONCLUSION: GBL and GBV provide incremental diagnostic information beyond conventional sonographic features. GBL is the strongest quantitative marker and may serve as a reproducible adjunct to established ultrasound findings. External validation of the proposed thresholds is required before broader clinical implementation.

Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology
Griffith University (AU), Bond University (AU), Gold Coast Hospital (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon