Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy of a Peer‐Delivered Group Intervention to Mitigate Risk of Disordered Eating Among Pregnant Individuals: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE: Pregnancy and postpartum are high-risk periods for body dissatisfaction and disordered eating, which adversely affect the wellbeing of pregnant people and their children. The Pregnant Body Project (PBP) is a peer-led intervention based on an empirically supported eating disorder prevention program, adapted to address the unique context and risks of pregnant individuals who have a prior history of disordered eating. METHOD: Pregnant individuals with a history of disordered eating (N = 65) were randomized to a 6-week virtual peer-led PBP group (n = 32) or an active time- and dose-matched health education control (n = 33). Participants completed measures of feasibility, engagement, acceptability, satisfaction, and clinical outcomes (e.g., disordered eating) at pre- and post-test. Descriptive statistics summarize primary implementation outcomes. Secondary clinical outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed effects models with time, treatment group, and their interaction, estimated using full information maximum likelihood under an intent to-treat approach. RESULTS: Recruitment, retention, and data collection met or exceeded preregistered thresholds. Program completion (88%) and homework completion (88%) indicated strong engagement, and PBP participants' average ratings for satisfaction, appropriateness, and acceptability were above the midpoint. Group leaders demonstrated high fidelity and competency. While not statistically significant, small effect sizes favored PBP for improvements in eating disorder symptoms and body image satisfaction (between group d = -0.10 to -0.26; within group d = -0.13 to -0.46). DISCUSSION: Findings support the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual, peer-led intervention tailored to pregnant individuals with a history of disordered eating. These findings provide a foundation for a larger-scale hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.70256
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy of a Peer‐Delivered Group Intervention to Mitigate Risk of Disordered Eating Among Pregnant Individuals: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Eric M. Stice, Nirajan Puri, Stephen J. Bartels, Rachel C. Vanderkruik et al.
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy of a Peer‐Delivered Group Intervention to Mitigate Risk of Disordered Eating Among Pregnant Individuals: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Eric M. Stice, Nirajan Puri, Stephen J. Bartels, Rachel C. Vanderkruik, Sophie Scharner, Emily Cross Woodworth, Lee S. Cohen, Marlene P. Freeman, Genevieve P. Nowicki, Gabriella E. Hamlett, Caroline M. Frisch, Skye E. Scoggins
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pregnancy and postpartum are high-risk periods for body dissatisfaction and disordered eating, which adversely affect the wellbeing of pregnant people and their children. The Pregnant Body Project (PBP) is a peer-led intervention based on an empirically supported eating disorder prevention program, adapted to address the unique context and risks of pregnant individuals who have a prior history of disordered eating. METHOD: Pregnant individuals with a history of disordered eating (N = 65) were randomized to a 6-week virtual peer-led PBP group (n = 32) or an active time- and dose-matched health education control (n = 33). Participants completed measures of feasibility, engagement, acceptability, satisfaction, and clinical outcomes (e.g., disordered eating) at pre- and post-test. Descriptive statistics summarize primary implementation outcomes. Secondary clinical outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed effects models with time, treatment group, and their interaction, estimated using full information maximum likelihood under an intent to-treat approach. RESULTS: Recruitment, retention, and data collection met or exceeded preregistered thresholds. Program completion (88%) and homework completion (88%) indicated strong engagement, and PBP participants' average ratings for satisfaction, appropriateness, and acceptability were above the midpoint. Group leaders demonstrated high fidelity and competency. While not statistically significant, small effect sizes favored PBP for improvements in eating disorder symptoms and body image satisfaction (between group d = -0.10 to -0.26; within group d = -0.13 to -0.46). DISCUSSION: Findings support the feasibility and acceptability of a virtual, peer-led intervention tailored to pregnant individuals with a history of disordered eating. These findings provide a foundation for a larger-scale hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.

International Journal of Eating Disorders
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Northeastern University (US), State University of New York (US), Harvard University (US), Hennepin County Medical Center (US), University at Albany, State University of New York (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon