Individual Mental Privacy in the Digitalization of Mental Health Care

The digitalization of mental health care generates new ways of recording and processing information about an individual's mental state, which reveals a mismatch between the sensitivity of such information and the scope of its legal protection: existing regulation links the extent of safeguards primarily to the manner in which information is obtained and the legal status of the entity processing it, whereas the degree of interference with private life is determined by the content of the information itself and its capacity to reveal an individual's inner mental sphere. Drawing on Russian legislation and legal scholarship, the article substantiates the independent significance of mental privacy as a legal category defining the content and limits of an individual's right to protection of the inner mental sphere; criteria are proposed for determining when information falls within this sphere, and it is established that the regimes of medical confidentiality and personal data protection do not exhaust the mechanisms of its legal protection. The need for additional safeguards in the digital processing of such information is substantiated, including requirements concerning the disclosure of information to the individual, the purposes and duration of data use, and the conditions of third-party access.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
STATE POWER AND LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18572/1813-1247-2026-11-30-33
Primary Topic
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Individual Mental Privacy in the Digitalization of Mental Health Care

Vladislava I. Boyarinova
1 links
STATE POWER AND LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
article

Individual Mental Privacy in the Digitalization of Mental Health Care

Vladislava I. Boyarinova
article en

Abstract

The digitalization of mental health care generates new ways of recording and processing information about an individual's mental state, which reveals a mismatch between the sensitivity of such information and the scope of its legal protection: existing regulation links the extent of safeguards primarily to the manner in which information is obtained and the legal status of the entity processing it, whereas the degree of interference with private life is determined by the content of the information itself and its capacity to reveal an individual's inner mental sphere. Drawing on Russian legislation and legal scholarship, the article substantiates the independent significance of mental privacy as a legal category defining the content and limits of an individual's right to protection of the inner mental sphere; criteria are proposed for determining when information falls within this sphere, and it is established that the regimes of medical confidentiality and personal data protection do not exhaust the mechanisms of its legal protection. The need for additional safeguards in the digital processing of such information is substantiated, including requirements concerning the disclosure of information to the individual, the purposes and duration of data use, and the conditions of third-party access.

STATE POWER AND LOCAL SELF-GOVERNMENT
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon