Patient face detection in paediatric intensive care using an offline AI model versus a commercial cloud service: a prospective proof-of-concept study

Introduction Clinical face detection is a prerequisite for future non-contact assessment of facial colour, expression, pain or movement in paediatric critical care, including in children with congenital heart disease but is challenged by occlusion and privacy concerns. Methods We compared a Raspberry Pi-based offline system with Google Cloud Vision using 442 annotated paediatric critical care unit bedside images and the IoGT metric. Results The custom model correctly detected patient faces in 92.5% of images, whereas the Google API detected patient faces in 60.4%. It also yielded fewer false detections of non-patient faces (1.6% vs 11.5%) and simultaneous misclassifications (1.4% vs 8.1%). The patient-cluster-aware analysis showed a 32.1 percentage-point detection-rate difference (95% CI 21.7 to 41.2; p=6.1×10⁻⁵). Conclusion Our findings suggest that a low-cost, privacy-preserving artificial intelligence (AI) system may improve patient-face detection at the bedside. Local retraining may support privacy-preserving AI use in paediatric critical care. Trial registration number UMIN000059415.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Innovations
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2025-001527
Primary Topic
Face recognition and analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient face detection in paediatric intensive care using an offline AI model versus a commercial cloud service: a prospective proof-of-concept study

Yuko Nawa, Michiaki Yamakage, Tomohiro Nawa, Tomohiro Chaki et al.
1 links
BMJ Innovations
Face recognition and analysis
article

Patient face detection in paediatric intensive care using an offline AI model versus a commercial cloud service: a prospective proof-of-concept study

Yuko Nawa, Michiaki Yamakage, Tomohiro Nawa, Tomohiro Chaki, Wataru Sakai, Tomohiro Wakabayashi, Yuki Ichisaka, Kyoko Kozai
article en

Abstract

Introduction Clinical face detection is a prerequisite for future non-contact assessment of facial colour, expression, pain or movement in paediatric critical care, including in children with congenital heart disease but is challenged by occlusion and privacy concerns. Methods We compared a Raspberry Pi-based offline system with Google Cloud Vision using 442 annotated paediatric critical care unit bedside images and the IoGT metric. Results The custom model correctly detected patient faces in 92.5% of images, whereas the Google API detected patient faces in 60.4%. It also yielded fewer false detections of non-patient faces (1.6% vs 11.5%) and simultaneous misclassifications (1.4% vs 8.1%). The patient-cluster-aware analysis showed a 32.1 percentage-point detection-rate difference (95% CI 21.7 to 41.2; p=6.1×10⁻⁵). Conclusion Our findings suggest that a low-cost, privacy-preserving artificial intelligence (AI) system may improve patient-face detection at the bedside. Local retraining may support privacy-preserving AI use in paediatric critical care. Trial registration number UMIN000059415.

BMJ Innovations
Sapporo Medical University (JP), Hokkaido Medical Center for Child Health and Rehabilitation (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Face recognition and analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Patient face detection in paediatric intensive care using an offline AI model versus a commercial cloud service: a prospective proof-of-concept study — Yuko Nawa, Michiaki Yamakage, et al. · BMJ Innovations (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS