The good, the bad, and the cringy: Introducing the EmpaToM-pos and EmpaToM-embarrass as tools for assessing empathy and theory of mind in diverse emotional contexts

Empathizing and mentalizing are crucial to social understanding, yet few instruments capture these processes across a broad emotional spectrum. The EmpaToM is a video-based paradigm that independently measures empathy and theory of mind (ToM) and can additionally incorporate a prosociality measure. As its current form is limited to negatively valenced emotional contexts, we introduce two expanded German versions: EmpaToM-pos, featuring positively valenced narrations, and EmpaToM-embarrass, featuring embarrassing narrations, alongside the original neutral and negative conditions. In two pilot studies (Ns = 28/27), we tested novel video stimuli and corresponding questions, revised them based on the data, and subsequently evaluated them in two higher-powered studies (Ns = 60/55). Results confirmed successful empathy induction in all emotional conditions: Participants reported feeling worse after negative, more joyful after positive, and more embarrassed after embarrassing narrations (compared to all other valence conditions, respectively). Emotional valence also influenced prosociality: Negative narrations prompted the highest willingness to invest, but positive and embarrassing narrations also elicited greater prosociality than the neutral condition. Both expanded versions supported reliable ToM assessment without ceiling effects and with similar performance levels in the ToM and control conditions. Analyses further revealed that, on an interindividual level, empathic resonance in both negative and positive contexts was positively correlated with the degree of prosociality, highlighting the interrelation between empathizing and social decision-making. By incorporating positive and embarrassing emotional contexts, the EmpaToM-pos and EmpaToM-embarrass broaden the range of assessable social-emotional experiences, offering new opportunities to investigate empathy, ToM, and prosociality in more ecologically valid and diverse settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavior Research Methods
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-026-03202-x
Primary Topic
Child and Animal Learning Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The good, the bad, and the cringy: Introducing the EmpaToM-pos and EmpaToM-embarrass as tools for assessing empathy and theory of mind in diverse emotional contexts

Anne Böckler, Eva Landmann
1 links
Behavior Research Methods
Child and Animal Learning Development
article

The good, the bad, and the cringy: Introducing the EmpaToM-pos and EmpaToM-embarrass as tools for assessing empathy and theory of mind in diverse emotional contexts

Anne Böckler, Eva Landmann
article en

Abstract

Empathizing and mentalizing are crucial to social understanding, yet few instruments capture these processes across a broad emotional spectrum. The EmpaToM is a video-based paradigm that independently measures empathy and theory of mind (ToM) and can additionally incorporate a prosociality measure. As its current form is limited to negatively valenced emotional contexts, we introduce two expanded German versions: EmpaToM-pos, featuring positively valenced narrations, and EmpaToM-embarrass, featuring embarrassing narrations, alongside the original neutral and negative conditions. In two pilot studies (Ns = 28/27), we tested novel video stimuli and corresponding questions, revised them based on the data, and subsequently evaluated them in two higher-powered studies (Ns = 60/55). Results confirmed successful empathy induction in all emotional conditions: Participants reported feeling worse after negative, more joyful after positive, and more embarrassed after embarrassing narrations (compared to all other valence conditions, respectively). Emotional valence also influenced prosociality: Negative narrations prompted the highest willingness to invest, but positive and embarrassing narrations also elicited greater prosociality than the neutral condition. Both expanded versions supported reliable ToM assessment without ceiling effects and with similar performance levels in the ToM and control conditions. Analyses further revealed that, on an interindividual level, empathic resonance in both negative and positive contexts was positively correlated with the degree of prosociality, highlighting the interrelation between empathizing and social decision-making. By incorporating positive and embarrassing emotional contexts, the EmpaToM-pos and EmpaToM-embarrass broaden the range of assessable social-emotional experiences, offering new opportunities to investigate empathy, ToM, and prosociality in more ecologically valid and diverse settings.

Behavior Research MethodsVol. 58(12)
University of Würzburg (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Child and Animal Learning Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon