Partisan social cognition and biased experiences in a polarized world: The neural processing of identity‐based group membership

Abstract Pairing neuroimaging and behavioral testing, we offer new insights into affective polarization, hyper‐partisanship, and their effects. Our findings introduce a temporal dimension to existing theoretical frameworks concerning the impact of social identity on political perceptions. We demonstrate that group‐identity shapes in‐the‐moment neural processing of real‐world experiences in a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) protocol and Cyberball game where participants experience varying levels of inclusion/exclusion from in/out‐group members. In other words, people don't simply rely upon group membership (e.g., partisanship, national identity) to post‐hoc rationalize an experience, but instead that group membership also actively biases neural processing of otherwise objectively identical experiences, shaping (and distorting) political perception, with significant behavioral effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Psychology
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.70219
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Partisan social cognition and biased experiences in a polarized world: The neural processing of identity‐based group membership

Su-Jin Hong, Agamemnon Krasoulis, Alexa M. Morcom, Adam Moore et al.
1 links
Political Psychology
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Partisan social cognition and biased experiences in a polarized world: The neural processing of identity‐based group membership

Su-Jin Hong, Agamemnon Krasoulis, Alexa M. Morcom, Adam Moore, Laura Cram, Cyril R Pernet, Neil Roberts
article en

Abstract

Abstract Pairing neuroimaging and behavioral testing, we offer new insights into affective polarization, hyper‐partisanship, and their effects. Our findings introduce a temporal dimension to existing theoretical frameworks concerning the impact of social identity on political perceptions. We demonstrate that group‐identity shapes in‐the‐moment neural processing of real‐world experiences in a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) protocol and Cyberball game where participants experience varying levels of inclusion/exclusion from in/out‐group members. In other words, people don't simply rely upon group membership (e.g., partisanship, national identity) to post‐hoc rationalize an experience, but instead that group membership also actively biases neural processing of otherwise objectively identical experiences, shaping (and distorting) political perception, with significant behavioral effects.

Political PsychologyVol. 47(6)
Hallym University (KR), University of Sussex (GB), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), MRC Centre for Reproductive Health (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Partisan social cognition and biased experiences in a polarized world: The neural processing of identity‐based group membership — Su-Jin Hong, Agamemnon Krasoulis, et al. · Political Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS