Fisheries growth amid sustainability evidence gaps across West Africa

Abstract National fisheries production is often used to support food-security and blue-economy narratives, but aggregate output does not establish whether ecological condition, fishing-dependent livelihoods and monitoring capacity are adequately documented. We integrate a complete 1990–2023 production panel for 17 West African countries with a verified inland-fisheries evidence base and a non-compensatory four-domain diagnostic. Regional production increased by 173.1%, yet production prominence was unrelated to socioeconomic evidence coverage or monitoring capacity. Ecological evidence was available for only ten countries and was inversely associated with production prominence within that selected subset. Baseline rules identified ecological–social mismatches in Nigeria, Senegal and Guinea; visibility–information mismatches in Mauritania, Cameroon and Sierra Leone; and ecological concern among several lower-prominence countries. Four of six compound classifications were stable across all 81 threshold scenarios. The findings show that production growth and sustainability evidence are distinct policy objects and should be reported separately.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11223026/v1
Primary Topic
Marine and fisheries research
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Fisheries growth amid sustainability evidence gaps across West Africa

J. O. Ed-Idoko, Richard Kindong, Tian Siquan, Gloria Igbodiegwu
Research Square
Marine and fisheries research
preprint

Fisheries growth amid sustainability evidence gaps across West Africa

J. O. Ed-Idoko, Richard Kindong, Tian Siquan, Gloria Igbodiegwu
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract National fisheries production is often used to support food-security and blue-economy narratives, but aggregate output does not establish whether ecological condition, fishing-dependent livelihoods and monitoring capacity are adequately documented. We integrate a complete 1990–2023 production panel for 17 West African countries with a verified inland-fisheries evidence base and a non-compensatory four-domain diagnostic. Regional production increased by 173.1%, yet production prominence was unrelated to socioeconomic evidence coverage or monitoring capacity. Ecological evidence was available for only ten countries and was inversely associated with production prominence within that selected subset. Baseline rules identified ecological–social mismatches in Nigeria, Senegal and Guinea; visibility–information mismatches in Mauritania, Cameroon and Sierra Leone; and ecological concern among several lower-prominence countries. Four of six compound classifications were stable across all 81 threshold scenarios. The findings show that production growth and sustainability evidence are distinct policy objects and should be reported separately.

Research Square
Shanghai Ocean University (CN)
Life below water, Decent work and economic growth
Marine and fisheries research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Fisheries growth amid sustainability evidence gaps across West Africa — J. O. Ed-Idoko, Richard Kindong, et al. · Research Square (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS