The Social Gradient of Pain in Europe: Income‐Related Inequities and the Modifying Role of Osteoarthritis

ABSTRACT Background Bodily pain is a frequent, disabling, and socially patterned population health burden. Although socioeconomic inequalities in pain have been described in Europe, it remains unclear whether this gradient changes in the presence of highly prevalent musculoskeletal conditions such as osteoarthritis. Methods We conducted a cross‐sectional study using anonymized EHIS Wave 3 microdata from 2018 to 2020. The final sample included 278,250 adults from 30 European countries. Bodily pain in the past 4 weeks was analysed as a binary outcome. Household income quintile was the main exposure and self‐reported osteoarthritis the effect modifier. Adjusted prevalence ratios were estimated using robust Poisson regression with an income‐by‐osteoarthritis interaction. Adjusted probabilities, the Relative Index of Inequality, the Slope Index of Inequality, and between‐country heterogeneity were also estimated. Results The weighted prevalence of pain was 55.04%. The income‐by‐osteoarthritis interaction was significant, χ 2 (4) = 135.00; p < 0.001. Among adults without osteoarthritis, higher income was associated with lower pain prevalence (Q5 vs. Q1: aPR = 0.909; 95% CI: 0.893–0.925), whereas osteoarthritis was associated with substantially higher pain prevalence (aPR = 1.392; 95% CI: 1.370–1.413). Without osteoarthritis, the RII was 1.125 and the SII was 4.75 percentage points; with osteoarthritis, the RII was 0.964 and the SII was −2.21 percentage points. Between‐country heterogeneity was significant, χ 2 (29) = 348.99; p < 0.001. Conclusions Bodily pain affects more than half of European adults and follows an income‐related pattern. Osteoarthritis modifies this inequality: without osteoarthritis, pain follows a classic socioeconomic gradient, whereas with osteoarthritis, pain remains highly prevalent across income groups and the gradient is attenuated or slightly reversed. Significance Statement This study demonstrates that income‐related inequalities in recent bodily pain vary according to self‐reported osteoarthritis status across 30 European countries. Its main contribution is to show that a high prevalence of pain in people reporting osteoarthritis may attenuate or obscure conventional socioeconomic gradients when pain is measured as a binary outcome. These findings highlight the limitations of relying exclusively on pain presence to characterize socioeconomic inequalities and support further investigation of pain severity and functional consequences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Pain
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.70441
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Social Gradient of Pain in Europe: Income‐Related Inequities and the Modifying Role of Osteoarthritis

Juan Antonio López-Rodríguez, Enrique Barros-Beracaza
European Journal of Pain
Health disparities and outcomes
article

The Social Gradient of Pain in Europe: Income‐Related Inequities and the Modifying Role of Osteoarthritis

Juan Antonio López-Rodríguez, Enrique Barros-Beracaza
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Bodily pain is a frequent, disabling, and socially patterned population health burden. Although socioeconomic inequalities in pain have been described in Europe, it remains unclear whether this gradient changes in the presence of highly prevalent musculoskeletal conditions such as osteoarthritis. Methods We conducted a cross‐sectional study using anonymized EHIS Wave 3 microdata from 2018 to 2020. The final sample included 278,250 adults from 30 European countries. Bodily pain in the past 4 weeks was analysed as a binary outcome. Household income quintile was the main exposure and self‐reported osteoarthritis the effect modifier. Adjusted prevalence ratios were estimated using robust Poisson regression with an income‐by‐osteoarthritis interaction. Adjusted probabilities, the Relative Index of Inequality, the Slope Index of Inequality, and between‐country heterogeneity were also estimated. Results The weighted prevalence of pain was 55.04%. The income‐by‐osteoarthritis interaction was significant, χ 2 (4) = 135.00; p < 0.001. Among adults without osteoarthritis, higher income was associated with lower pain prevalence (Q5 vs. Q1: aPR = 0.909; 95% CI: 0.893–0.925), whereas osteoarthritis was associated with substantially higher pain prevalence (aPR = 1.392; 95% CI: 1.370–1.413). Without osteoarthritis, the RII was 1.125 and the SII was 4.75 percentage points; with osteoarthritis, the RII was 0.964 and the SII was −2.21 percentage points. Between‐country heterogeneity was significant, χ 2 (29) = 348.99; p < 0.001. Conclusions Bodily pain affects more than half of European adults and follows an income‐related pattern. Osteoarthritis modifies this inequality: without osteoarthritis, pain follows a classic socioeconomic gradient, whereas with osteoarthritis, pain remains highly prevalent across income groups and the gradient is attenuated or slightly reversed. Significance Statement This study demonstrates that income‐related inequalities in recent bodily pain vary according to self‐reported osteoarthritis status across 30 European countries. Its main contribution is to show that a high prevalence of pain in people reporting osteoarthritis may attenuate or obscure conventional socioeconomic gradients when pain is measured as a binary outcome. These findings highlight the limitations of relying exclusively on pain presence to characterize socioeconomic inequalities and support further investigation of pain severity and functional consequences.

European Journal of PainVol. 30(10)
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES), Sociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon