Policy Brief: The Role of Courts in European Climate Governance

Climate litigation has become an established feature of climate governance in the European Union, yet it has rarely been analysed systematically across the EU, particularly before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). This summary presents the findings of a RETOOL policy brief (Koistinen, Savaresi and Setzer, November 2026), which draws on two original case datasets and an Irish case study. The brief finds that litigation before national courts is concentrated in a few Member States, is driven mainly by civil society, and is increasingly directed at corporations. At the CJEU, by contrast, corporations are the dominant claimants and cases mostly concern the interpretation and implementation of EU climate law. Across both levels, litigation mainly gives effect to democratically adopted law rather than making climate policy, and the prospect of judicial scrutiny can improve public decision-making. Its democratic contribution, however, depends on effective access to justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23882231
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Policy Brief: The Role of Courts in European Climate Governance

Joana Setzer, Annalisa Savaresi, Nina Koistinen
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Environmental law and policy
article

Policy Brief: The Role of Courts in European Climate Governance

Joana Setzer, Annalisa Savaresi, Nina Koistinen
article en

Abstract

Climate litigation has become an established feature of climate governance in the European Union, yet it has rarely been analysed systematically across the EU, particularly before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). This summary presents the findings of a RETOOL policy brief (Koistinen, Savaresi and Setzer, November 2026), which draws on two original case datasets and an Irish case study. The brief finds that litigation before national courts is concentrated in a few Member States, is driven mainly by civil society, and is increasingly directed at corporations. At the CJEU, by contrast, corporations are the dominant claimants and cases mostly concern the interpretation and implementation of EU climate law. Across both levels, litigation mainly gives effect to democratically adopted law rather than making climate policy, and the prospect of judicial scrutiny can improve public decision-making. Its democratic contribution, however, depends on effective access to justice.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Stirling (GB), University of Eastern Finland (FI), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Climate action, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Environmental law and policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Policy Brief: The Role of Courts in European Climate Governance — Joana Setzer, Annalisa Savaresi, et al. · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS