THEORETICAL EXPLANATIONS OF LEARNING DISABILITIES: COGNITIVE AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACHES

Abstract: This article reviews cognitive and neuropsychological theories of learning disabilities, drawing on the American, British, German and French literatures and on documents of international organisations. The study is a narrative review. At the cognitive level it covers the phonological deficit, double-deficit, working memory, visual attention span and number sense accounts. At the neuropsychological level it covers the left-hemisphere reading network, the magnocellular, cerebellar and temporal sampling theories, and genetic findings. The review shows that single-cause explanations have given way to probabilistic, multiple-deficit models. The phonological deficit remains the strongest cognitive predictor of reading difficulty, yet it is neither necessary nor sufficient on its own. Orthographic transparency shapes how difficulties appear, which calls for specific criteria in transparent orthographies such as Turkish. WHO, APA, UNESCO and OECD documents and national guidelines converge on a dimensional view of diagnosis and on evidence-based, inclusive intervention.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23885028
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THEORETICAL EXPLANATIONS OF LEARNING DISABILITIES: COGNITIVE AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACHES

Jale Dişli Kutlu
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reading and Literacy Development
article

THEORETICAL EXPLANATIONS OF LEARNING DISABILITIES: COGNITIVE AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACHES

Jale Dişli Kutlu
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This article reviews cognitive and neuropsychological theories of learning disabilities, drawing on the American, British, German and French literatures and on documents of international organisations. The study is a narrative review. At the cognitive level it covers the phonological deficit, double-deficit, working memory, visual attention span and number sense accounts. At the neuropsychological level it covers the left-hemisphere reading network, the magnocellular, cerebellar and temporal sampling theories, and genetic findings. The review shows that single-cause explanations have given way to probabilistic, multiple-deficit models. The phonological deficit remains the strongest cognitive predictor of reading difficulty, yet it is neither necessary nor sufficient on its own. Orthographic transparency shapes how difficulties appear, which calls for specific criteria in transparent orthographies such as Turkish. WHO, APA, UNESCO and OECD documents and national guidelines converge on a dimensional view of diagnosis and on evidence-based, inclusive intervention.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon