Performance Evaluation and Cost Economics of a Power-Operated Maize Dehusker cum Sheller for Small and Marginal Farmers

Aims: To evaluate the performance of a small, single-phase electric maize dehusker cum sheller at three feed rates and to estimate its cost of operation with that of manual dehusking and shelling. Study Design: A two-factor factorial experiment (three feed rates × three independent trials) with three one-hour replications, giving 27 test runs. Place and Duration of Study: AICRP on Farm Implements and Machinery and Dairy Farm, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra, India, 2022–2023. Methodology: The machine (1.5 kW motor; two-bar cylinder of 154 mm diameter at 1366 rpm; spring-loaded rod concave; straight-blade blower) was tested with maize cv. Rajarshi at a grain moisture content of 15.5 % (w.b.) and feed rates of 300, 350 and 400 kg cobs h−1 following IS 6284. Capacity, efficiencies and loss components were analysed using analysis of variance, and the cost of operation was estimated in accordance with IS 9164. Results: Dehusking efficiency was 100 % in every run. Raising the feed rate from 300 to 400 kg h−1 increased grain output from 212.1 to 277.3 kg h−1 (R2 = 0.98; P < .001). Shelling efficiency fell marginally from 99.34 to 99.20 % and cleaning efficiency from 98.64 to 98.27 % (P < .001). Unthreshed grain rose from 0.66 to 0.79 %, whereas the proportion of broken grain (0.38 to 0.28 %) and blower loss (2.06 to 1.51 %) declined, so that total loss fell from 3.10 to 2.58 % (P < .001). Blower loss accounted for 58–67 % of the total loss. The machine cost Rs 37,360 to build and dehusked and shelled maize at Rs 0.43 kg−1 against Rs 7.62 kg−1 by hand, cutting labour from 20.3 to 0.72 man-h per 100 kg of grain. The payback period was 0.76 years, the benefit–cost ratio 2.33, and the break-even use 41 h yr−1. Conclusion: A feed rate of 400 kg h−1 gave the highest output and the lowest total loss with a small reduction in cleaning efficiency. The machine is technically reliable and economically attractive for small and marginal farmers and for custom hiring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Scientific Research and Reports
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2026/v32i114690
Primary Topic
Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Evaluation and Cost Economics of a Power-Operated Maize Dehusker cum Sheller for Small and Marginal Farmers

S. M. Nalawade, Sanjay Chandrakant Bhangare, T. B. Bastewad, Akshay Kinge et al.
Journal of Scientific Research and Reports
Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
article

Performance Evaluation and Cost Economics of a Power-Operated Maize Dehusker cum Sheller for Small and Marginal Farmers

S. M. Nalawade, Sanjay Chandrakant Bhangare, T. B. Bastewad, Akshay Kinge, Pavan P. Panzade, Anjani Kumar Yadav, Diwakar Tiwari, Rohit Gaddamwar
article en

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the performance of a small, single-phase electric maize dehusker cum sheller at three feed rates and to estimate its cost of operation with that of manual dehusking and shelling. Study Design: A two-factor factorial experiment (three feed rates × three independent trials) with three one-hour replications, giving 27 test runs. Place and Duration of Study: AICRP on Farm Implements and Machinery and Dairy Farm, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra, India, 2022–2023. Methodology: The machine (1.5 kW motor; two-bar cylinder of 154 mm diameter at 1366 rpm; spring-loaded rod concave; straight-blade blower) was tested with maize cv. Rajarshi at a grain moisture content of 15.5 % (w.b.) and feed rates of 300, 350 and 400 kg cobs h−1 following IS 6284. Capacity, efficiencies and loss components were analysed using analysis of variance, and the cost of operation was estimated in accordance with IS 9164. Results: Dehusking efficiency was 100 % in every run. Raising the feed rate from 300 to 400 kg h−1 increased grain output from 212.1 to 277.3 kg h−1 (R2 = 0.98; P < .001). Shelling efficiency fell marginally from 99.34 to 99.20 % and cleaning efficiency from 98.64 to 98.27 % (P < .001). Unthreshed grain rose from 0.66 to 0.79 %, whereas the proportion of broken grain (0.38 to 0.28 %) and blower loss (2.06 to 1.51 %) declined, so that total loss fell from 3.10 to 2.58 % (P < .001). Blower loss accounted for 58–67 % of the total loss. The machine cost Rs 37,360 to build and dehusked and shelled maize at Rs 0.43 kg−1 against Rs 7.62 kg−1 by hand, cutting labour from 20.3 to 0.72 man-h per 100 kg of grain. The payback period was 0.76 years, the benefit–cost ratio 2.33, and the break-even use 41 h yr−1. Conclusion: A feed rate of 400 kg h−1 gave the highest output and the lowest total loss with a small reduction in cleaning efficiency. The machine is technically reliable and economically attractive for small and marginal farmers and for custom hiring.

Journal of Scientific Research and ReportsVol. 32(11)
Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute (IN), Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth (IN), National Institute of Abiotic Stress Management (IN), Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IN)
Zero hunger, Responsible consumption and production, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon