Patients’ experiences of analgesic use for chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary care: An interview study in Germany

Chronic musculoskeletal pain is a leading cause of primary care consultations and presents challenges for analgesic prescribing across health systems. While pharmacological treatments are widely used, little is known about patients’ experiences with non-opioid analgesics and their preferences for involvement in treatment decision-making. This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with 17 patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain recruited from primary care practices in Germany. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically following Braun and Clarke’s approach using a combined inductive–deductive coding strategy. Coding was conducted by two researchers with iterative consensus discussions. A patient advisory board contributed to study design and interpretation. Analgesics were described as situational adjuncts rather than standalone treatments, with non-pharmacological strategies often prioritised. Participants expressed three orientations towards analgesics: accepting, cautious and explicitly multimodal. Non-opioid analgesics – particularly metamizole – were commonly used, while opioids played a minor role. Patients’ decision-making processes ranged from autonomous to delegated and were shaped by trust in clinicians and symptom burden. Information about risks was inconsistently reported, and continuity of care was central to confidence in analgesic use. Analgesic use in chronic musculoskeletal pain is shaped by dynamic decision-making processes, trust and continuity of care. These findings highlight the importance of clear risk communication and relational continuity in supporting patient-centred analgesic management in primary care. Analgesics are used as situational tools within broader self-management strategies rather than as standalone treatments.Decision-making is dynamic and shaped by trust, continuity of care and symptom burden, requiring flexible GP communication.Deprescribing and medication review remain under-addressed and should be integrated proactively into routine primary care. Analgesics are used as situational tools within broader self-management strategies rather than as standalone treatments. Decision-making is dynamic and shaped by trust, continuity of care and symptom burden, requiring flexible GP communication. Deprescribing and medication review remain under-addressed and should be integrated proactively into routine primary care.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.34888851
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Opioid Use
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patients’ experiences of analgesic use for chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary care: An interview study in Germany

Nele Kornder, Becker Annette, Victoria Jessica Hill, Sophia Naomi Groffebert et al.
1 links
Figshare
Pain Management and Opioid Use
article

Patients’ experiences of analgesic use for chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary care: An interview study in Germany

Nele Kornder, Becker Annette, Victoria Jessica Hill, Sophia Naomi Groffebert, Nicole Lindner, Annika Viniol
article en

Abstract

Chronic musculoskeletal pain is a leading cause of primary care consultations and presents challenges for analgesic prescribing across health systems. While pharmacological treatments are widely used, little is known about patients’ experiences with non-opioid analgesics and their preferences for involvement in treatment decision-making. This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with 17 patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain recruited from primary care practices in Germany. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically following Braun and Clarke’s approach using a combined inductive–deductive coding strategy. Coding was conducted by two researchers with iterative consensus discussions. A patient advisory board contributed to study design and interpretation. Analgesics were described as situational adjuncts rather than standalone treatments, with non-pharmacological strategies often prioritised. Participants expressed three orientations towards analgesics: accepting, cautious and explicitly multimodal. Non-opioid analgesics – particularly metamizole – were commonly used, while opioids played a minor role. Patients’ decision-making processes ranged from autonomous to delegated and were shaped by trust in clinicians and symptom burden. Information about risks was inconsistently reported, and continuity of care was central to confidence in analgesic use. Analgesic use in chronic musculoskeletal pain is shaped by dynamic decision-making processes, trust and continuity of care. These findings highlight the importance of clear risk communication and relational continuity in supporting patient-centred analgesic management in primary care. Analgesics are used as situational tools within broader self-management strategies rather than as standalone treatments.Decision-making is dynamic and shaped by trust, continuity of care and symptom burden, requiring flexible GP communication.Deprescribing and medication review remain under-addressed and should be integrated proactively into routine primary care. Analgesics are used as situational tools within broader self-management strategies rather than as standalone treatments. Decision-making is dynamic and shaped by trust, continuity of care and symptom burden, requiring flexible GP communication. Deprescribing and medication review remain under-addressed and should be integrated proactively into routine primary care.

Figshare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Pain Management and Opioid Use
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon