Examining the Impact of Habitat Fragmentation on Mammalian Genetic Diversity in Biodiversity Hotspots: A Meta-Analysis

Habitat fragmentation is among the foremost threats to global biodiversity, yet its genetic consequences for mammalian populations within biodiversity hotspots remain poorly quantified. These regions, characterised by exceptional species richness, endemism and disproportionate habitat loss, represent the highest-priority targets for conservation worldwide. To address this gap, we conducted a meta-analysis of the genetic effects of habitat fragmentation on mammals in biodiversity hotspots. Fifteen peer-reviewed studies published between 2009 and 2024 were assessed, and effect sizes (Hedges’ g) were pooled under a random-effects model with Hartung–Knapp adjustment for five microsatellite-based genetic metrics: observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygosity (He), number of alleles (NA), allelic richness (AR), and inbreeding coefficient (FIS). The main analysis included the six studies in which both the fragmented and the control populations were located within hotspots. In this analysis, pooled differences between fragmented and control populations were not distinguishable from zero for any metric (Ho: g = −0.04, 95% CI −0.54 to 0.46; He: −0.10, −0.43 to 0.23; NA: 0.21, −0.25 to 0.67; AR: −0.14, −0.57 to 0.30; FIS: −0.12, −0.78 to 0.54), and confidence and prediction intervals were wide because only four to six studies contributed to each estimate. In a sensitivity analysis of up to twelve studies that relaxed the hotspot criterion, He was lower in fragmented populations (g = −0.26, 95% CI −0.42 to −0.09, k = 11), whereas Ho, NA, AR and FIS did not differ significantly. Egger’s test did not indicate funnel-plot asymmetry in the sensitivity analysis, but its power was low. The evidence from studies located entirely within hotspots is currently too limited to determine the direction or size of fragmentation effects on mammalian microsatellite diversity. More primary studies with explicit comparisons of fragmented and continuous populations within hotspots are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23880067
Primary Topic
Genetic diversity and population structure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining the Impact of Habitat Fragmentation on Mammalian Genetic Diversity in Biodiversity Hotspots: A Meta-Analysis

Ferhat Matur, Uğur Çakar
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Genetic diversity and population structure
article

Examining the Impact of Habitat Fragmentation on Mammalian Genetic Diversity in Biodiversity Hotspots: A Meta-Analysis

Ferhat Matur, Uğur Çakar
article en

Abstract

Habitat fragmentation is among the foremost threats to global biodiversity, yet its genetic consequences for mammalian populations within biodiversity hotspots remain poorly quantified. These regions, characterised by exceptional species richness, endemism and disproportionate habitat loss, represent the highest-priority targets for conservation worldwide. To address this gap, we conducted a meta-analysis of the genetic effects of habitat fragmentation on mammals in biodiversity hotspots. Fifteen peer-reviewed studies published between 2009 and 2024 were assessed, and effect sizes (Hedges’ g) were pooled under a random-effects model with Hartung–Knapp adjustment for five microsatellite-based genetic metrics: observed heterozygosity (Ho), expected heterozygosity (He), number of alleles (NA), allelic richness (AR), and inbreeding coefficient (FIS). The main analysis included the six studies in which both the fragmented and the control populations were located within hotspots. In this analysis, pooled differences between fragmented and control populations were not distinguishable from zero for any metric (Ho: g = −0.04, 95% CI −0.54 to 0.46; He: −0.10, −0.43 to 0.23; NA: 0.21, −0.25 to 0.67; AR: −0.14, −0.57 to 0.30; FIS: −0.12, −0.78 to 0.54), and confidence and prediction intervals were wide because only four to six studies contributed to each estimate. In a sensitivity analysis of up to twelve studies that relaxed the hotspot criterion, He was lower in fragmented populations (g = −0.26, 95% CI −0.42 to −0.09, k = 11), whereas Ho, NA, AR and FIS did not differ significantly. Egger’s test did not indicate funnel-plot asymmetry in the sensitivity analysis, but its power was low. The evidence from studies located entirely within hotspots is currently too limited to determine the direction or size of fragmentation effects on mammalian microsatellite diversity. More primary studies with explicit comparisons of fragmented and continuous populations within hotspots are needed.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Dokuz Eylül University (TR)
Life on land
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Genetic diversity and population structure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon