Verification of the NIMSTELL code via application to linear magnetohydrodynamic instabilities in stellarators

A new simulation tool for macroscale dynamics in stellarators, NIMSTELL [Sovinec et al., “Semi-implicit stellarator magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) with nodal spectral elements,” arXiv:2606.28613 (2026)], is verified through benchmarking with the time-dependent code JOREK [Nikulsin et al., Phys. Plasmas 29, 063901 (2022)] and the eigenvalue code CASTOR3D [E. Strumberger and S. Günter, Nucl. Fusion 57, 016032 (2016)]. The comparisons establish NIMSTELL's accuracy and reliability in representative configurations, where analytical results are not tractable. Results from all three codes are assessed for linear tearing and ballooning instabilities in W7-A and tearing in a quasi-axisymmetric (QA) configuration. NIMSTELL and CASTOR3D are also applied to global non-resonant interchange in a quasi-helically symmetric (QH) configuration. The computed NIMSTELL and CASTOR3D growth rates agree to the level of 1.5% and 3% for tearing modes in W7-A and QA configurations, respectively, to 5.8% for a W7-A ballooning mode, and to 1.6% for a global interchange mode in QH configurations. While NIMSTELL results also agree with JOREK for a majority of the benchmark cases, the numerical discrepancies are somewhat larger than those with respect to CASTOR3D in specific parameter regimes. The discrepancies are largely ascribed to the use of reduced-MHD modeling in the JOREK computations. In addition to benchmarking, the nonlinear capability of NIMSTELL is demonstrated by modeling the loss of pressure due to global interchange modes in the QH configuration. The successful verification presented in this work provides support for applying NIMSTELL to physically relevant stability analyses of current experiments and future designs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Plasmas
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0351043
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Verification of the NIMSTELL code via application to linear magnetohydrodynamic instabilities in stellarators

R. Ramasamy, N. Nikulsin, Carl R. Sovinec, S. Patil
Physics of Plasmas
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Verification of the NIMSTELL code via application to linear magnetohydrodynamic instabilities in stellarators

R. Ramasamy, N. Nikulsin, Carl R. Sovinec, S. Patil
article en

Abstract

A new simulation tool for macroscale dynamics in stellarators, NIMSTELL [Sovinec et al., “Semi-implicit stellarator magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) with nodal spectral elements,” arXiv:2606.28613 (2026)], is verified through benchmarking with the time-dependent code JOREK [Nikulsin et al., Phys. Plasmas 29, 063901 (2022)] and the eigenvalue code CASTOR3D [E. Strumberger and S. Günter, Nucl. Fusion 57, 016032 (2016)]. The comparisons establish NIMSTELL's accuracy and reliability in representative configurations, where analytical results are not tractable. Results from all three codes are assessed for linear tearing and ballooning instabilities in W7-A and tearing in a quasi-axisymmetric (QA) configuration. NIMSTELL and CASTOR3D are also applied to global non-resonant interchange in a quasi-helically symmetric (QH) configuration. The computed NIMSTELL and CASTOR3D growth rates agree to the level of 1.5% and 3% for tearing modes in W7-A and QA configurations, respectively, to 5.8% for a W7-A ballooning mode, and to 1.6% for a global interchange mode in QH configurations. While NIMSTELL results also agree with JOREK for a majority of the benchmark cases, the numerical discrepancies are somewhat larger than those with respect to CASTOR3D in specific parameter regimes. The discrepancies are largely ascribed to the use of reduced-MHD modeling in the JOREK computations. In addition to benchmarking, the nonlinear capability of NIMSTELL is demonstrated by modeling the loss of pressure due to global interchange modes in the QH configuration. The successful verification presented in this work provides support for applying NIMSTELL to physically relevant stability analyses of current experiments and future designs.

Physics of PlasmasVol. 33(11)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics - Greifswald (DE), Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon