The unsettled PRICE: BAKHSHISH and the boundaries of remuneration in OTTOMAN ISTANBUL, 1870–1914

Bakhshish occupied an unstable position in the everyday exchanges and service relations of late Ottoman Istanbul. Neither reducible to gratuity nor synonymous with corruption, it attached monetary expectations to services, transactions, and entitlements whose formal terms seemed already settled. Drawing on Ottoman archival records, newspapers, and contemporary accounts dating from 1870 to 1914, this article examines how custom, repeated expectation, and control over performance converted supplementary payment into a form of social obligation and customary remuneration. Salarization, regulated charges, and formally defined rights did not eliminate such claims but changed the terms on which workers, officials, and service providers might justify them. Conflict sharpened when bakhshish supplemented wages, conditioned completion or access, or entered administrative discretion. Formalization sharpened the boundaries among gratuity, remuneration, improper exaction, and bribery without eliminating workers’ dependence on payments beyond the formal wage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Labor History
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0023656x.2026.2757639
Primary Topic
Ottoman Empire History and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The unsettled PRICE: BAKHSHISH and the boundaries of remuneration in OTTOMAN ISTANBUL, 1870–1914

Cem Doğan
Labor History
Ottoman Empire History and Society
article

The unsettled PRICE: BAKHSHISH and the boundaries of remuneration in OTTOMAN ISTANBUL, 1870–1914

Cem Doğan
article en

Abstract

Bakhshish occupied an unstable position in the everyday exchanges and service relations of late Ottoman Istanbul. Neither reducible to gratuity nor synonymous with corruption, it attached monetary expectations to services, transactions, and entitlements whose formal terms seemed already settled. Drawing on Ottoman archival records, newspapers, and contemporary accounts dating from 1870 to 1914, this article examines how custom, repeated expectation, and control over performance converted supplementary payment into a form of social obligation and customary remuneration. Salarization, regulated charges, and formally defined rights did not eliminate such claims but changed the terms on which workers, officials, and service providers might justify them. Conflict sharpened when bakhshish supplemented wages, conditioned completion or access, or entered administrative discretion. Formalization sharpened the boundaries among gratuity, remuneration, improper exaction, and bribery without eliminating workers’ dependence on payments beyond the formal wage.

Labor History
Iğdır Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ottoman Empire History and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon