Reading the Evidence Before Believing the Headline
Every clinician now practises inside a stream of announced breakthroughs, and the ability to judge the study behind the headline has become a core clinical skill. The perspective article in this issue makes that case plainly and usefully. It reminds us that the distance between a promising result and a proven therapy is long: in the meta-analysis it cites, half of therapies moved from animal to human trials and 40% reached randomised controlled trials, yet only 5% won regulatory approval.
Authors
- Minu Bajpai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0745-7225)
- Abhijat C. Sheth (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0553-884X)
Institutions
- National Board of Examinations (IN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- NATIONAL BOARD OF EXAMINATIONS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
- Published
- 2026-11-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.61770/nbejms.2026.v04.i11.002
- Primary Topic
- Health Sciences Research and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00