Developing and evaluating the validity and reliability of the quality-of-life questionnaire of Stroke-induced aphasia-Persian (QOLSA-P)

Background Aphasia quality of life (QOL) questionnaire already exists in Persian [Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39)], yet cultural considerations may limit its adequacy for Persian-speaking populations. Besides, it lacks a specific linguistic focus and aphasia-friendly visual supports.Aims This study aimed to: 1) develop the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire for Stroke-Induced Aphasia in Persian (QOLSA-P) based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework; and 2) examine its psychometric properties of validity and reliability.Methods & procedures The study involved 125 Persian-speaking people with aphasia (53 females, 72 males; age range = 30–90 years, M = 59.6; post-stroke duration: M = 17.8, range: 1–132 months), eight primary communication partners (proxies), and 35 experts. A pool of 772 items was generated, which was reduced to 54 items after face and content validation. The pictographic version of the QOLSA-P incorporated images and was evaluated for validity and reliability. The 16-item short form (QOLSA-P-16) was derived through exploratory factor analysis (EFA).Outcomes & Results The final 36-item questionnaire (QOLSA-P-36), demonstrated strong correlation with the Persian SAQOL-39 (r = 0.61, p < 0.001), reflecting good convergent validity. Significant differences were observed between mild and severe aphasia groups (F = 3.998, p < 0.05), revealing sufficient known-group validity. The QOLSA-P-36 showed good internal consistency (α = 0.78–0.89, ω = 0.78–0.88) and moderate to good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.60–0.84). The EFA extracted four factors of communication, support and relationships, self-care, and emotions – and the results explained 50.8% of the total variance. QOLSA-P-16 demonstrated good internal consistency and test-retest reliability (α = 0.73–0.84; ICC = 0.53–0.84).Conclusions The QOLSA-P was proven to be a valid, reliable, and culturally appropriate instrument for assessing quality of life in Persian-speaking people with aphasia, suitable for both clinical and research applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aphasiology
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2026.2749601
Primary Topic
Health Education and Validation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing and evaluating the validity and reliability of the quality-of-life questionnaire of Stroke-induced aphasia-Persian (QOLSA-P)

Mohsen Vahedi, Fariba Yadegari, Zahra Babaei
Aphasiology
Health Education and Validation
article

Developing and evaluating the validity and reliability of the quality-of-life questionnaire of Stroke-induced aphasia-Persian (QOLSA-P)

Mohsen Vahedi, Fariba Yadegari, Zahra Babaei
article en

Abstract

Background Aphasia quality of life (QOL) questionnaire already exists in Persian [Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39)], yet cultural considerations may limit its adequacy for Persian-speaking populations. Besides, it lacks a specific linguistic focus and aphasia-friendly visual supports.Aims This study aimed to: 1) develop the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire for Stroke-Induced Aphasia in Persian (QOLSA-P) based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework; and 2) examine its psychometric properties of validity and reliability.Methods & procedures The study involved 125 Persian-speaking people with aphasia (53 females, 72 males; age range = 30–90 years, M = 59.6; post-stroke duration: M = 17.8, range: 1–132 months), eight primary communication partners (proxies), and 35 experts. A pool of 772 items was generated, which was reduced to 54 items after face and content validation. The pictographic version of the QOLSA-P incorporated images and was evaluated for validity and reliability. The 16-item short form (QOLSA-P-16) was derived through exploratory factor analysis (EFA).Outcomes & Results The final 36-item questionnaire (QOLSA-P-36), demonstrated strong correlation with the Persian SAQOL-39 (r = 0.61, p < 0.001), reflecting good convergent validity. Significant differences were observed between mild and severe aphasia groups (F = 3.998, p < 0.05), revealing sufficient known-group validity. The QOLSA-P-36 showed good internal consistency (α = 0.78–0.89, ω = 0.78–0.88) and moderate to good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.60–0.84). The EFA extracted four factors of communication, support and relationships, self-care, and emotions – and the results explained 50.8% of the total variance. QOLSA-P-16 demonstrated good internal consistency and test-retest reliability (α = 0.73–0.84; ICC = 0.53–0.84).Conclusions The QOLSA-P was proven to be a valid, reliable, and culturally appropriate instrument for assessing quality of life in Persian-speaking people with aphasia, suitable for both clinical and research applications.

Aphasiology
University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences (IR), Babol University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Health Education and Validation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon