Bridging the gap: disability justice in Africa’s traditional dispute resolution mechanisms

Governments across Africa have assumed an obligation to ensure that at all levels of administration, the basic rights of all people, including persons with disabilities, are being respected and protected. This article explores the juridical implications of traditional dispute resolution mechanisms (TDRMs) for the rights of persons with disabilities. TDRMs are a celebration of Africa’s cultural diversity. Through them, African nations have been able to enrich their brand of legal pluralism. The core of personal law is very much the domain of TDRMs, which is of particular significance to the rights of persons with disabilities. Using the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Africa (ADP), this article examines the extent to which TDRMs have calcified and legitimised the exclusion of persons with disabilities in Africa. It argues that although African states have managed to make significant progress in the area of TDRMs, this has been accompanied by stagnation or regression in areas where disability rights have been involved.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Human Rights
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2026.2753200
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the gap: disability justice in Africa’s traditional dispute resolution mechanisms

Paul Ochieng Juma
The International Journal of Human Rights
Disability Rights and Representation
article

Bridging the gap: disability justice in Africa’s traditional dispute resolution mechanisms

Paul Ochieng Juma
article en

Abstract

Governments across Africa have assumed an obligation to ensure that at all levels of administration, the basic rights of all people, including persons with disabilities, are being respected and protected. This article explores the juridical implications of traditional dispute resolution mechanisms (TDRMs) for the rights of persons with disabilities. TDRMs are a celebration of Africa’s cultural diversity. Through them, African nations have been able to enrich their brand of legal pluralism. The core of personal law is very much the domain of TDRMs, which is of particular significance to the rights of persons with disabilities. Using the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Africa (ADP), this article examines the extent to which TDRMs have calcified and legitimised the exclusion of persons with disabilities in Africa. It argues that although African states have managed to make significant progress in the area of TDRMs, this has been accompanied by stagnation or regression in areas where disability rights have been involved.

The International Journal of Human Rights
Egerton University (KE)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon